Skutki braku uznania państwa w świetle prawa międzynarodowego

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorZaręba, Szymon
dc.date.accessioned2021-01-13T11:00:14Z
dc.date.available2021-01-13T11:00:14Z
dc.date.issued2020-12
dc.description.abstractThe main argument of the book is that the legal effects of recognition of a certain entity as a state vary depending on the degree of acceptance of its statehood by the international community, particularly by other states. If its status is contested, the entity in question remains just a regime with a limited international personality – as opposed to a state, which enjoys full international personality.en_EN
dc.description.abstractThe first two chapters explore the role of recognition and non-recognition in the process of creation of states in international law. The analysis demonstrates that the international community usually expects an entity aspiring to statehood to meet certain criteria: to have a permanent population, a defined territory and an effective and sovereign government, and to be established in a manner consistent with the norms of jus cogens. The process of emergence of a state is also influenced by a number of legal principles which are sometimes difficult to reconcile, such as those of non-interference in internal affairs, self-determination, territorial integrity and uti possidetis. Still, international practice clearly indicates that in the end it is the already existing states who assess whether the above criteria have been fulfilled, and whether the above principles have been observed in a given case. They express their opinion through granting or refusing recognition to a given entity. This makes the whole process to a large extent discretionary and, because of that, also highly politicised. As a consequence, some entities have been universally recognised as states despite manifest deficiencies as regards their fulfilment of the criteria of statehood, at least temporary (e.g. Guinea Bissau, Bosnia and Herzegovina). On the other hand, a number of entities aspiring to statehood which seemed or seem to fulfil these criteria have been virtually or totally unrecognised (e.g. Chechnya, Somaliland) and have not been considered states by the international community as a whole.en_EN
dc.description.abstractFor these reasons, the book argues that statehood and full objective international legal personality depend on recognition of the claim to statehood of a given entity by the international community. It provides the reader with general guidelines as to who needs to recognise such an entity as a state in order to produce this effect, including, inter alia, recognition or non-recognition by the parent state, neighbouring states, major superpowers and other states, the United Nations and relevant regional international organisations. Moreover, it maintains that if the number and type of states or international organisations recognising an entity is insufficient to confer full international personality on it, the entity in question becomes a regime. In such cases, only those states who recognise it consider it a state. The non-recognising states, as well as international organisations and courts, treat it as a non-state entity with subjective and limited international personality. This personality may appear similar to that of a state in certain aspects, but in general is much narrower (e.g. for the purposes of application of international customary law or enforcement of international responsibility).en_EN
dc.description.abstractThe approach presented in the study differs from the classical constitutive theory of recognition of states, in that it is based on hermeneutical methodology. Because of that, it puts stress on interpretation of the legal meaning of a specific act of recognition of an entity aspiring to statehood – not only in the context of bilateral relations between the recognising and the recognised, but also taking into account whether, and to what extent that entity is also recognised by other states or not. Furthermore, it maintains that states who do not recognise the entity aspiring to statehood may still enjoy some rights and have certain obligations towards it, whether it is a state (when the scope of these rights or obligations is larger) or a regime (when this scope is much narrower). This means that states cannot evade their obligations under international law towards entities aspiring to statehood simply by refusing to recognise them.en_EN
dc.description.abstractThe two following chapters of the book analyse the legal effects of non-recognition of both states and regimes in various spheres to establish the differences between their status in international law. The analysis focuses on those elements of activity of states and regimes at the international level which are related to the traditionally understood international legal personality, i.e. the ability to have rights and duties derived directly from international law, to participate in the creation of new norms of such law, to raise claims based on this law and bear international responsibility for their own actions and omissions under this law, as well as the passive and active right of legation. As it turns out, the differences between states and regimes are not only quantitative, but also qualitative, and the legal status of regimes in international law remains much more precarious than partly recognised states, i.e. those which are not recognised by the entire international community (e.g. Israel, North Korea).en_EN
dc.description.abstractThe analysis shows that unlike states, regimes do not benefit from many of the rights under customary international law, such as the prohibition of the use of force or interference in internal affairs, or the obligation to respect territorial integrity. Some very rare exceptions to this rule result from the unique circumstances of non-recognition of a given regime, combined with the emergence of the conviction in the international community that it should have been nevertheless subject to such norms, as in the case of Macedonia at the beginning of the 1990s. On the other hand, regimes benefit from certain rights enjoyed by other non-state actors, such as limited protection under customary international humanitarian law. At the same time, international practice strongly suggests that states regard regimes as obliged to respect most of the basic norms of customary international law, including the previously mentioned obligations and prohibitions. Thus the status of regimes is much different compared to that of states, whose scope of rights seems to correspond to the scope of their duties. The reason for this is that states, unlike regimes, enjoy full international legal personality and because of their status as sovereigns, benefit from the principle of equality.en_EN
dc.description.abstractOne can also observe interesting differences between the status of states and regimes with respect to international responsibility. As is clear from the practice and jurisprudence of international courts, nowadays regimes are increasingly treated as non-state actors controlled by third states that support them. They are regarded as responsible on their own only in exceptional cases. In contrast, the responsibility for unlawful acts committed by partly unrecognised states against states that do not recognise them is directly attributed to the former. In the area of enforcing claims, the differences in treatment of states and regimes are somewhat blurred, but the greater number of forums in which states are active significantly facilitates pursuing international law claims against them despite the lack of recognition. At the same time, both states and regimes have serious difficulties in enforcing responsibility for unlawful acts committed by states that refuse to recognise them. This problem is once again more acute in case of regimes.en_EN
dc.description.abstractThe rules with regard to communication by non-recognising states with states or regimes they do not recognise are quite similar. The limits of freedom of action in this area are determined by the concerns of entities which refuse to recognise that they could be accused of implicit recognition. As regards postal, telephone and electronic communication, the opportunities of contact are clearly limited, while international practice is relatively liberal with respect to the bilateral meetings and visits. In case of the latter, however, there is a tendency to frame possible visits to various regimes, or visits from representatives of such entities, as private and unofficial. When it comes to multilateral meetings and conferences, there is a trend among states which refuse recognition to avoid contact with regimes they do not recognise, but it would be difficult to speak of a uniform norm developed in this regard. Certainly, the approach of states to such cases is strongly influenced by protests made by parent states regarding the participation of specific entities in various types of multilateral negotiations, as well as by the claims that these entities raise in connection with their own participation in meetings in multilateral formats.
dc.description.abstractAs regards other forms of contact, it is inadmissible for a non-recognising state to establish diplomatic relations with either a state or a regime it does not recognise, as the establishment of such relations implies recognition. As for consular relations, they are acceptable between states despite non-recognition, but they are not maintained between states and regimes they do not recognise – some occasional exceptions have been situations where regimes were believed to be able to quickly acquire statehood (e.g. Macedonia). After World War II, one can also observe a large variety of solutions aimed at maintaining quasi-diplomatic and quasi-consular contacts despite the lack of recognition, both in relations with states and regimes.en_EN
dc.description.abstractThere are also clear differences in the treatment of states and regimes as regards treaty relations. The analysis of international practice shows that states may conclude various bilateral treaties and political agreements with states that they do not recognise. The few exceptions include treaties that comprehensively regulate mutual relations and alliances – however, the cases under analysis suggest that it is still possible to address these issues in informal agreements. As regards regimes, states that refuse to recognise them may not conclude bilateral treaties but only political agreements, albeit these may be very diverse in terms of content and differ from treaties in fact mainly in their form, sometimes a unique one. When it comes to multilateral treaties, the situation is somewhat different. It is clear from international practice that concluding such treaties and agreements involving regimes not recognised by some parties is almost unheard of, and is almost exclusively limited to instruments that regulate situations arising from armed conflicts. The exceptions are very sporadic cases when a regime participates in the conclusion of a multilateral agreement by acting in a specific capacity, e.g. as a fishing entity. Cases of conclusion of multilateral treaties with a state that is not recognised by some parties are somewhat more frequent, and relevant treaties may cover a slightly broader scope of issues. In addition to various types of treaties ending armed conflicts, treaties of a technical nature are also sometimes concluded, as well as treaties covering issues considered crucial for the international community, such as limiting nuclear tests. Finally, as regards the accession to existing multilateral treaties, it would be difficult to point out any clear differences between states and regimes not recognised by some parties. However, there is a growing tendency to create various types of solutions in treaties enabling accession by non-state entities, used mainly by Taiwan. Another problem is the application of multilateral agreements between the non-recognising and non-recognised parties – states often try to exclude such a possibility through reservations or declarations, but such attempts are often considered to be without legal effect. It is also incorrect to argue that the lack of recognition is a definitive barrier to establishing a relationship on the basis of a given multilateral treaty between parties who do not recognise each other.en_EN
dc.description.abstractA completely different problem is that of the status of states or regimes in the domestic law of states that do not recognise them. One should note a lack of clear differences in the legal situation of these two groups. This is due to the fact that issues related to the status of a state or regime in the domestic legal order of a non-recognising state largely escape international regulation and are left to the discretion of individual states. This relates to issues such as legal capacity, capacity to perform acts in law, passive and active capacity to be party to legal proceedings. For example, both states and regimes are rarely given the opportunity to lodge complaints or actions. Usually, they are not even treated as legal persons within the meaning of the legal order of the non-recognising state. On the other hand, there have been cases where national courts accepted actions brought against them, denying them state immunity, and also cases where national courts concluded that entities aspiring to statehood enjoyed immunity despite the lack of recognition by the authorities in a given state. What matters greatly in such cases is whether the adjudicating court is seated in a state of common law or continental jurisdiction. In the former, the issues of immunities are generally resolved in accordance with the wish expressed by the executive, in the latter, the decisions are very diverse. Finally, as regards the diplomatic and consular immunities of officials of a state or regime not recognised by the host state, in practice they largely depend on the goodwill of the host state. Judicial practice generally covers cases in which there have been disputes as to the immunities or privileges of persons representing regimes and not states, which may suggest that the immunities of persons representing the latter are respected to a greater extent and do not cause controversy. This would be consistent with existing rules of international law regarding the immunities of persons holding important state functions.en_EN
dc.description.abstractOne can also note a diminishing role of international recognition in cases of the acceptance of internal acts (legal acts, court judgments, administrative decisions and documents) issued by states and regimes that are not recognised by the state whose authorities examine a given case. The jurisprudence shows that in virtually all states there is a tendency to take into account these acts for the purposes of court proceedings. Again, quite significant differences exist in this respect between the states of the common law system, where the courts largely follow the approach of the executive power (although this has begun to change, even in the UK), and the states of the continental system, where judges are allowed more freedom to adjudicate. In the latter situation, courts relatively often completely ignore the issue of recognition, focusing rather on the effectiveness of the legal order of a given entity, or the compliance of recognition of acts of such an entity with the public order.en_EN
dc.description.abstractFinally, as the research has shown, the impact of international jurisprudence on the acceptance of internal acts by national authorities should be considered moderate. In fact, the humanitarian exception proposed by the International Court of Justice in the Namibia case has never been unequivocally accepted in national legal orders. Some courts have referred to it, but it seems unjustified to argue that states have a customary obligation to accept acts which affect the rights of private persons despite non-recognition of the entities which have issued them. Still, states party to the European Convention on Human Rights may feel compelled to respect such acts. The case law of the European Court of Human Rights allows, or even requires, that the parties to the Convention take into account quite a wide range of acts of unrecognised regimes, even including certain acts of a public-law nature. This may raise justified doubts from the point of view of the compliance of such an approach with, for example, United Nations resolutions.en_EN
dc.description.tableofcontents<< s. 9-10 >> Wykaz skrótów << s. 11 >> Od autora << s. 13-25 >> Wprowadzenie << s. 26-85 >> Pojęcie państwa << s. 86-183 >> Uznanie państwa i jego brak << s. 184-361 >> Konsekwencje braku uznania na szczeblu międzynarodowym << s. 362-412 >> Skutki braku uznania w krajowych porządkach prawnych << s. 413-424 >> Zakończenie
dc.identifier.isbn978-83-950165-7-8
dc.identifier.isbn978-83-950165-6-1
dc.identifier.isbn978-83-950165-8-5
dc.identifier.otherwww.doi.org/10.37232/978-83-950165-8-5
dc.identifier.urihttps://e-bp.inp.pan.pl/handle/123456789/203
dc.language.isoplpl_PL
dc.publisherInstytut Nauk Prawnych PANpl_PL
dc.relation.ispartofseriesRozprawy Prawnicze. Seria monograficzna INP PAN;
dc.subjectnieuznawanie (prawo międzynarodowe)pl_PL
dc.subjectuznanie państwpl_PL
dc.subjectpaństwopl_PL
dc.subjectzobowiązania erga omnespl_PL
dc.subjectius cogenspl_PL
dc.subjectodpowiedzialność międzynarodowapl_PL
dc.subjectodpowiedzialność państwapl_PL
dc.subjectstosunki dyplomatycznepl_PL
dc.subjectstosunki konsularnepl_PL
dc.subjectprawo traktatówpl_PL
dc.subjectumowa dwustronnapl_PL
dc.subjectumowa wielostronnapl_PL
dc.subjectstosunki międzynarodowepl_PL
dc.subjectimmunitet państwapl_PL
dc.subjectzdolność prawnapl_PL
dc.subjectlegitymacja procesowapl_PL
dc.subjectosobowość prawnapl_PL
dc.subjectakt wewnętrznypl_PL
dc.titleSkutki braku uznania państwa w świetle prawa międzynarodowegopl_PL
dc.typeBookpl_PL
dcterms.referencesAgung I.A.A.G., Twenty years Indonesian foreign policy 1945–1965, Mouton & Co., The Hague 1973.
dcterms.referencesAhmed D.M., Boundaries and Secession in Africa and International Law: Challenging Uti Possidetis, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2015.
dcterms.referencesAkehurst M., State Responsibility for the Wrongful Acts of Rebels – An Aspect of the Southern Rhodesian Problem, „British Yearbook of International Law”, 1968, t. 43.
dcterms.referencesAkehurst M., Vietnam and International Law, „Otago Law Review”, 1973, t. 3, nr 1.
dcterms.referencesAkpınarlı N., The Fragility of the ‘Failed State’ Paradigm: A Different International Law Perception of the Absence of Effective Government, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Leiden–Boston 2010.
dcterms.referencesAlesina A., Spolaore E., The Size of Nations, MIT Press, Cambridge–London 2003.
dcterms.referencesAmerasinghe C.F., Sri Lanka (Ceylon) [w:] E. Lauterpacht, J.G. Collier (red.), Individual Rights and the State in Foreign Affairs. An International Compendium, Praeger Publishers, New York 1977.
dcterms.referencesAmerican Law Institute, Restatement of the Law (Third), t. 1: The Foreign Relations Law of the United States, American Law Institute, Washington 1987.
dcterms.referencesAnand R.P., Sovereign Equality of States in International Law, „Recueil des Cours”, 1986, t. 197
dcterms.referencesAnon., Government recognition in Somalia and regional political stability in the Horn of Africa, „Journal of Modern African Studies” 2002, t. 40, nr 2
dcterms.referencesAnon., Non-recognition: a reconsideration, „The University of Chicago Law Review”, 1954, t. 22, nr 1.
dcterms.referencesAnon., Recognition – People’s Republic of China – Province of China, „Australian Year Book of International Law”, 1981, t. 10.
dcterms.referencesAnon., Recognition of States – Croatia and Slovenia – declarations of independence from Yugoslavia, „Australian Year Book of International Law”, 1990, t. 13.
dcterms.referencesAntonowicz L., Państwa i terytoria. Studium prawnomiędzynarodowe, PWN, Warszawa 1988.
dcterms.referencesAntonowicz L., Pojęcie państwa w prawie międzynarodowym, PWN, Warszawa 1974.
dcterms.referencesAntonowicz L., Samostanowienie narodów jako zasada prawa międzynarodowego, „Annales UMCS, Sectio G (Ius)”, 1996, nr 43.
dcterms.referencesAntonowicz L., Status prawnomiędzynarodowy Republiki Chińskiej na Tajwanie [w:] E. Haliżak (red.), Tajwan w stosunkach międzynarodowych, Fundacja Studiów Międzynarodowych, Warszawa 1997.
dcterms.referencesAnzilotti D., Cours de droit international, t. 1, Librarie du Recueil Sirey, Paris 1929.
dcterms.referencesAshbrook J., Bakich S.D., Storming to partition: Croatia, the United States, and Krajina in the Yugoslav War, „Small Wars & Insurgencies”, 2010, t. 21, nr 4
dcterms.referencesAttix C., Between the Devil and the Deep Blue Sea: Are Taiwan’s Trading Partners Implying Recognition of Taiwanese Statehood?, „California Western International Law Journal”, 1995, t. 25.
dcterms.referencesAufricht H., Principles and Practices of Recognition by International Organizations, „The American Journal of International Law” 1949, t. 43, nr 4.
dcterms.referencesAust A., Handbook of International Law, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2005.
dcterms.referencesBachmann K., Fatić A., The UN International Criminal Tribunals: Transition without justice?, Routledge, Abingdon–New York 2015.
dcterms.referencesBailey S.D., The Korean Armistice, Palgrave Macmillan, New York 1992.
dcterms.referencesBalcerzak M., Odpowiedzialność państwa-strony Europejskiej konwencji o ochronie praw człowieka i podstawowych wolności. Studium prawnomiędzynarodowe, Wydawnictwo „Dom Organizatora”, Toruń 2013.
dcterms.referencesBalekjian W.H., Die Effektivität und die Stellung Nichtanerkannter Staaten im Völkerrecht, Martinus Nijhoff, Den Haag 1970.
dcterms.referencesBanerjee A., Moroccan Entry to the African Union and the Revival of the Western Sahara Dispute, „Harvard International Law Journal”, 2017, t. 59.
dcterms.referencesBantekas I., The Authority of States to Use Names in International Law and the Macedonian Affair: Unilateral Entitlements, Historic Title, and Trademark Analogies, „Leiden Journal of International Law”, 2009, t. 22, nr 3.
dcterms.referencesBarnes W.S., United States Recognition Policy and Cambodia [w:] R.A. Falk (red.), The Vietnam War and International Law, t. 3, Princeton University Press, Princeton 1972.
dcterms.referencesBarroso J.P. de A., Uznanie państwa w świetle prawa międzynarodowego, Uniwersytet Warszawski, Warszawa 1994.
dcterms.referencesBaty T., Abuse of Terms: ‘Recognition’: ‘War,’ „The American Journal of International Law”, 1936, t. 30, nr 3
dcterms.referencesBaty T., So-Called ‘De Facto’ Recognition, „The Yale Law Journal”, 1922, t. 31, nr 5.
dcterms.referencesBeck A., A South African Homeland Appears in the English Courts: Legitimation of the Illegitimate?,„International and Comparative Law Quarterly”, 1987, t. 36, nr 2.
dcterms.referencesBellocchi L.P., Recent developments: Self-determination in the Case of Chechnya, „Buffalo Journal of International Law”, 1995, t. 2
dcterms.referencesBenneh E.Y., Statehood, Territory, Recognition and International Law: Their Interrelationships [w:] E.K. Quashigah, O.C. Okafor (red.), Legitimate Governance in Africa. International and Domestic Legal Perspectives, Kluwer Law International, The Hague 1999.
dcterms.referencesBenson L., Yugoslavia: A Concise History, Palgrave, Houndmills–New York 2001.
dcterms.referencesBerezowski C., Powstanie państwa polskiego w świetle prawa narodów, Wydawnictwo Sejmowe, Warszawa 2008.
dcterms.referencesBerezowski C., Zagadnienia zwierzchnictwa terytorialnego: z teorii prawa międzynarodowego, Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe, Warszawa 1957.
dcterms.referencesBettwy S.W., United States – Vatican Recognition: Background and Issues, „The Catholic Lawyer” 1984, t. 29, nr 3
dcterms.referencesBierzanek R., La non-reconnaissance et le droit international contemporain, „Annuaire Français de Droit International”, 1962, t. 8
dcterms.referencesBierzanek R., Studia nad społecznością międzynarodową. Źródła prawa międzynarodowego, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Marii Curie-Skłodowskiej, Lublin 1991.
dcterms.referencesBlix H.M., Contemporary Aspects of Recognition, „Recueil des Cours”, 1970, t. 130.
dcterms.referencesBlix H.M., Treaty-Making Power, Stevens & Sons Limited, London 1960
dcterms.referencesBlomeyer-Bartenstein H., Diplomatic Relations, Establishment and Severance [w:] R. Bernhardt (red.), Max Planck Encyclopedia of International Law, t. 9, International Relations and Legal Cooperation in General Diplomacy and Consular Relations, Elsevier Science Publishers, Amsterdam 1986.
dcterms.referencesBlum Y.Z., Diplomatic agents and missions [w:] R. Bernhardt (red.), Max Planck Encyclopedia of International Law, t. 9, International Relations and Legal Cooperation in General Diplomacy and Consular Relations, Elsevier Science Publishers, Amsterdam 1986
dcterms.referencesBokor-Szegő H., New States and International Law, Akadé miai Kiadó, Budapest 1970.
dcterms.referencesBond J.E., Internal Conflict and Article Three of the Geneva Conventions, „Denver Law Journal”, 1971, t. 48
dcterms.referencesBonfils H., Fauchille P., Manuel du droit international public, Librairie Arthur Rousseau, Paris 1905.
dcterms.referencesBonham M.L.J., The British Consuls in the Confederacy, Longmans, Green & Co., New York 1911
dcterms.referencesBooysen H., Recognition, Treaties and the Courts, „South African Yearbook of International Law”, 1977, t. 3.
dcterms.referencesBorchard E., Recognition and Non-Recognition, „The American Journal of International Law”, 1942, t. 36, nr 1.
dcterms.referencesBorchard E.M., The Diplomatic Protection of Citizens Abroad, The Banks Law Publishing Co., New York 1925
dcterms.referencesBorgen C., States and International Law: The Problems of Self-Determination, Secession and Recognition [w:] B. Çalı (red.), International Law for International Relations, Oxford University Press, Oxford 2010
dcterms.referencesBos M., The first suit of the Republic of the South Moluccas against the «Koninklijke Paketvaart Maatschappij» S.A., „Journal du Droit International”, 1953, t. 80, nr 1.
dcterms.referencesBot B.R., Nonrecognition and Treaty Relations, A.W.Sijthoff, Leiden 1968.
dcterms.referencesBowring B., Transnistria [w:] C. Walter, A. von Ungern-Sternberg, K. Abushov (red.), Self-Determination and Secession in International Law, Oxford University Press, Oxford 2014
dcterms.referencesBoyle F.A., Creating the State of Palestine, „The Palestine Yearbook of International Law”, 1987, t. 4.
dcterms.referencesBoyle F.A., The Creation of the State of Palestine, „The European Journal of International Law”, 1990, t. 1, nr 1
dcterms.referencesBrierly J.L., Règles générales du droit de la paix, „Recueil des Cours”, 1936, t. 58.
dcterms.referencesBrierly J.L., The Law of Nations, Clarendon Press, Oxford 1963.
dcterms.referencesBriggs H., Non-Recognition of Title by Conquest and Limitations on the Doctrine, „American Society of International Law Proceedings”, 1940, t. 34.
dcterms.referencesBriggs H.W., Community Interest in the Emergence of New States: The Problem of Recognition, „Proceedings of the American Society of International Law”, 1950, t. 44.
dcterms.referencesBriggs H.W., Recognition of States: Some Reflections on Doctrine and Practice, „The American Journal of International Law”, 1949, t. 43, nr 1.
dcterms.referencesBrownlie I., Principles of Public International Law, Oxford University Press, Oxford 2008.
dcterms.referencesBrownlie I., Recognition in Theory and Practice, „British Yearbook of International Law”, 1982, t. 53.
dcterms.referencesBrownlie I., The Rule of Law in International Affairs, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, The Hague 1998.
dcterms.referencesBrunnée J., Toope S.J., Constructivism and International Law [w:] J.L. Dunoff, M.A. Pollack (red.), Interdisciplinary Perspectives on International Law and International Relations. The State of the Art, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2012
dcterms.referencesBuchowska N., Uchwały organizacji międzynarodowych jako źródło prawa międzynarodowego, „Ruch Prawniczy, Ekonomiczny i Socjologiczny”, 2001, t. LXIII, nr 3.
dcterms.referencesBugnion F., Jus ad bellum, jus in bello and non-international armed conflicts, „Yearbook of International Humanitarian Law”, 2003, t. 6
dcterms.referencesBühler K.G., State Succession and Membership in International Organizations: Legal Theories versus Political Pragmatism, Kluwer Law International, The Hague 2001.
dcterms.referencesCaplan R., Europe and the Recognition of New States in Yugoslavia, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2005.
dcterms.referencesCardozo M.H., Judicial Deference to State Department Suggestions: Recognition of Prerogative or Abdication to Usurper?, „Cornell Law Review”, 1963, t. 48, nr 3.
dcterms.referencesCaspersen N., Stansfield G. (red.), Unrecognized States in the International System, Routledge, Abingdon–New York 2011.
dcterms.referencesCassese A., For an Enhanced Role of Jus Cogens [w:] A. Cassese (red.), Realizing Utopia: The Future of International Law, Oxford University Press, Oxford 2012.
dcterms.referencesCassese A., The Nicaragua and Tadić Tests Revisited in Light of the ICJ Judgment on Genocide in Bosnia, „European Journal of International Law”, 2007, t. 18, nr 4.
dcterms.referencesCerone J., Legal Implications of the UN General Assembly Vote to Accord Palestine the Status of Observer State, „ASIL Insights”, 2012, t. 16, nr 37.
dcterms.referencesČervenka Z., Legal Effects of Non-Recognition of Southern Rhodesia’s Unilateral Declaration of Independence in International Law, „Časopis pro mezinărodní prăvo”, 1967, t. 11, nr 2
dcterms.referencesChang P., Lim K., Taiwan’s Case for United Nations Membership, „UCLA Journal of International Law and Foreign Affairs”, 1996, t. 1.
dcterms.referencesCharnovitz S., Taiwan’s WTO Membership and Its International Implications, „Asian Journal of WTO & International Health Law and Policy”, 2006, t. 1, nr 2.
dcterms.referencesCharpentier J., La reconnaissance du G. P. R. A., „Annuaire Français de Droit International”, 1959, t. 5
dcterms.referencesCharpentier J., La reconnaissance internationale et l’evolution du droit des gens, Éditions Pedone, Paris 1956.
dcterms.referencesChen T.C., The International Law of Recognition, Frederick A. Preaeger, New York 1951.
dcterms.referencesChen Y.T., Fishing Entity Enforcement in High Seas Fisheries, Cambridge Scholars Publishing, Newcastle upon Tyne 2014.
dcterms.referencesChesterman S., Johnstone I., Malone D.M., Law and Practice of the United Nations: Documents and Commentary, Oxford University Press, Oxford 2016.
dcterms.referencesChowdhury S.R., The Genesis of Bangladesh: A Study in International Legal Norms andPermissive Conscience, Asia Publishing House, London 1972.
dcterms.referencesChristakis T., L’obligation de non-reconnaissance des situations créées par le recours illicite à la force ou d’autres actes enfreignant des règles fondamentales [w:] C. Tomuschat, J.M. Thouvenin (red.), The Fundamental Rules of the International Legal Order: Jus Cogens and Obligations Erga Omnes, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Leiden–Boston 2006.
dcterms.referencesChurchill R.R., Lowe A.V., The law of the sea, Manchester University Press, Manchester 1988.
dcterms.referencesCohen R., Legal Problems Arising from the Dissolution of the Mali Federation, „British Yearbook of International Law”, 1960, t. 36.
dcterms.referencesColliard C.A., Institutions internationales, Dalloz, Paris 1956.
dcterms.referencesCollier S., Sater W.F., A History of Chile, 1808–1994, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1996.
dcterms.referencesCommittee on Foreign Relations, U.S. Senate, Recognition of Bangladesh, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington 1972.
dcterms.referencesConforti B. Focarelli C., The Law and Practice of the United Nations, Brill, Leiden–Boston 2016.
dcterms.referencesCorten O., Déclarations unilatérales d’indépendance et reconnaissances prématurées: Du Kosovo à l’Ossétie et à l’Abkhazie, „Revue Gé né rale de Droit International Public”, 2008, t. 112, nr 4.
dcterms.referencesCoyle J.J., Russia’s Border Wars and Frozen Conflicts, Springer International Publishing, Cham 2017.
dcterms.referencesCrawford J., Brownlie’s Principles of Public International Law, Oxford University Press, Oxford 2012.
dcterms.referencesCrawford J., Israel (1948–1949) and Palestine (1998–1999): Two Studies in the Creation of States [w:] G.S. Goodwin-Gill, S. Talmon (red.), The Reality of International Law: Essays in Honour of Ian Brownlie, Clarendon Press, Oxford 1999.
dcterms.referencesCrawford J., Kosovo and the Criteria for Statehood in International Law [w:] M. Milanović, M. Wood (red.), The Law and Politics of the Kosovo Advisory Opinion, Oxford University Press, Oxford 2015.
dcterms.referencesCrawford J., State Responsibility [w:] R. Wolfrum (red.), Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law, Oxford University Press, Oxford 2006, http://opil.ouplaw.com.
dcterms.referencesCrawford J., State [w:] R. Wolfrum (red.), Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law, Oxford University Press, Oxford 2011.
dcterms.referencesCrawford J., The Creation of the State of Palestine: Too Much Too Soon?, „The European Journal of International Law”, 1990, t. 1, nr 1.
dcterms.referencesCrawford J., The Criteria for Statehood in International Law, „British Yearbook of International Law”, 1976, t. 48.
dcterms.referencesCrawford J., Who is a Government? The Executive and the Courts, „Cambridge Law Journal”, 1993, t. 52, nr 1.
dcterms.referencesCrawford J.,The Creation of States in International Law, Clarendon Press, Oxford 2006.
dcterms.referencesCruise D.L., The Premature Recognition of Bosnia-Herzegovina : Letters from Javier Pérez de Cuéllar, „The Brown Journal of Foreign Affairs”, 1993, t. 1, nr 1
dcterms.referencesCryer R., Hervey T., Sokhi-Bulley B., Research Methodologies in EU and International Law, Hart Publishing, Oxford–Portland 2011.
dcterms.referencesCullen A., Wheatley S., The Human Rights of Individuals in De Facto Regimes under the European Convention on Human Rights, „Human Rights Law Review”, 2013, t. 13, nr 4.
dcterms.referencesCzaplińska A., Konsekwencje nieuznania: przypadek Tureckiej Republiki Cypru Północnego w wybranych orzeczeniach ETPC i ETS [w:] J. Menkes, E. Wacinkiewicz-Cała (red.), Państwo i terytorium w prawie międzynarodowym, Wydawnictwo C.H. Beck, Warszawa 2015.
dcterms.referencesCzaplińska A., Odpowiedzialność organizacji międzynarodowych jako element uniwersalnego systemu odpowiedzialności międzynarodowoprawnej, Uniwersytet Łódzki, Łódź 2014.
dcterms.referencesCzapliński W., Akty jednostronne w prawie międzynarodowym, „Sprawy Międzynarodowe”, 1988, t. 41, nr 6.
dcterms.referencesCzapliński W., Customary Law of the Use of Force, „Revista da Faculdade de Direito da Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais”, 2016, t. 69.
dcterms.referencesCzapliński W., Kilka uwag na temat statusu prawnego Niemiec w latach 1945–1949, „Przegląd Zachodni”, 1988, t. 4.
dcterms.referencesCzapliński W., Między efektywnością a legalizmem. Obowiązek nieuznawania sytuacji nielegalnych w prawie międzynarodowym [w:] A. Wnukiewicz-Kozłowska (red.), Aksjologia współczesnego prawa międzynarodowego, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Wrocławskiego, Wrocław 2011.
dcterms.referencesCzapliński W., Recognition and non-recognition beyond the ICJ’s Advisory Opinion [w:] M. Arcari, L. Balmond (red.), Questions de droit international autour de l’avis consultatif de la Cour Internationale de Justice sur le Kosovo, Giufrè Editore, Milano 2011.
dcterms.referencesCzapliński W., Wyrozumska A., Prawo międzynarodowe publiczne. Zagadnienia systemowe, Wydawnictwo C.H. Beck, Warszawa 2014.
dcterms.referencesCzapliński W., Zmiany terytorialne w Europie Środkowej i Wschodniej i ich skutki międzynarodowoprawne (1990–1992), Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar, Warszawa 1998.
dcterms.referencesCzaputowicz J., Teorie stosunków międzynarodowych. Krytyka i systematyzacja, Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, Warszawa 2008.
dcterms.referencesCzubik P., Dokumenty z państw nieuznanych w obrocie cywilnoprawnym, „Problemy Współczesnego Prawa Międzynarodowego, Europejskiego i Porównawczego”, 2009, t. 7, nr 1.
dcterms.referencesCzubik P., Przyjmowanie dokumentów zagranicznych wystawianych w ramach jurysdykcji tzw. państw nieuznanych (uwagi na tle specyficznego przypadku dokumentów z Tajwanu), „Nowy Przegląd Notarialny”, 2012, t. 52, nr 2.
dcterms.referencesCzubik P., Stosunki dyplomatyczne, konsularne i quasi-konsularne z udziałem państw nieuznanych i pomiędzy nimi. Przyczynek do teorii alternatywnej przestrzeni iuris gentium [w:] K. Karski (red.), Kierunki rozwoju współczesnego prawa międzynarodowego, Bellona, Warszawa 2015.
dcterms.referencesCzubocha K., Pojęcie państwa i procesy państwowotwórcze we współczesnym prawie międzynarodowym, Wydawnictwo Adam Marszałek, Toruń 2012.
dcterms.referencesD’Amato A., The Concept of Human Rights in International Law, „Columbia Law Review”, 1982, t. 82, nr 6.
dcterms.referencesd’Aspremont J., Regulating Statehood: The Kosovo Status Settlement, „Leiden Journal of International Law”, 2007, t. 20, nr 3.
dcterms.referencesde Kerchove d’Exaerde F., Quelques questions en droit international public relatives à la présence et à l’activité du Gouvernement Belge en exil à Londres, „Revue Belge de Droit International”, 1990, t. 23, nr 1
dcterms.referencesde Lapradelle A., Politis N., Recueil des arbitrages internationaux, t. 2: (1855–1872), A. Pedone, Paris 1923.
dcterms.referencesde Martens F., Traité de droit international, Librairie A. Maresco Ainé , Paris 1883.
dcterms.referencesDe Schutter O., International Human Rights Law: Cases, Materials, Commentary, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2010.
dcterms.referencesde Visscher C., Théories et réalités en droit international public, Editions A. Pedone, Paris 1970.
dcterms.referencesde Visscher P., La responsabilité de l’État du chef des actes et engagements d’un gouvernement local de fait, en cas d’echec de ce gouvernement [w:] red. b.d., Album Professor Fernand van Goethem, Standaard-Boekhandel, Antwerpen 1964.
dcterms.referencesDe Wet E., The Governance of Kosovo: Security Council Resolution 1244 and the Establishment and Functioning of EULEX, „The American Journal of International Law”, 2009, t. 103, nr 1.
dcterms.referencesDegan V.D., Création et disparition de l’Etat (à la lumière du démembrement de trois fédérations multiethniques en Europe), „Recueil des Cours”, 1999, t. 279.
dcterms.referencesDembiński L., Samostanowienie w prawie i praktyce ONZ, Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe, Warszawa 1969.
dcterms.referencesDennis T.A., The Principality of Sealand: Nation Building by Individuals, „Tulsa Journal of Comparative and International Law”, 2002, t. 10, nr 1.
dcterms.referencesDenza E., Diplomatic Law: A Commentary on the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations, Clarendon Press, Oxford 1998
dcterms.referencesDenza E., European Practice on the Recognition of States, „European Law Review”, 2011, t. 36, nr 3.
dcterms.referencesDesgrandchamps M.L., Dealing with ‘genocide’: the ICRC and the UN during the Nigeria–Biafra war, 1967–70, „Journal of Genocide Research”, 2014, t. 16, nr 2–3.
dcterms.referencesDevine D.J., Status of Rhodesia in International Law (part 1), „Acta Juridica”, 1967.
dcterms.referencesDevine D.J., Status of Rhodesia in International Law (part 2), „Acta Juridica”, 1973.
dcterms.referencesDevine D.J., Status of Rhodesia in International Law (part 3), „Acta Juridica”, 1974.
dcterms.referencesDevine D.J., The Requirements of Statehood Re-Examined, „The Modern Law Review”, 1971, t. 34, nr 4.
dcterms.referencesDevine F., Metody jakościowe [w:] D. Marsh, G. Stoker (red.), Teorie i metody w naukach politycznych, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego, Kraków 2006.
dcterms.referencesDhada M., The Liberation War in Guinea-Bissau Reconsidered, „The Journal of Military History” 1998, t. 62, nr 3.
dcterms.referencesDickinson E.D., The Equality of States in International Law, Harvard University Press, Cambridge 1920.
dcterms.referencesDickinson E.D., Unrecognized Government or State in English and American Law (Part 1), „Michigan Law Review”, 1923, t. 22, nr 1.
dcterms.referencesDistefano G., Henry E., Final Provisions, Including the Martens Clause [w:] A. Clapham, P. Gaeta, M. Sassòli (red.), The 1949 Geneva Conventions: A Commentary, Oxford University Press, Oxford 2015.
dcterms.referencesDoukas K.A., The Non-Recognition Law of the United States, „Michigan Law Review”, 1937, t. 35, nr 7.
dcterms.referencesDowns C., Over the Line: North Korea’s Negotiating Strategy, The EAI Press, Washington 1999.
dcterms.referencesDugard J., Collective Non-Recognition – The Failure of South Africa’s Bantustan States [w:] Boutros Boutros-Ghali Amicorum Discipulorumque Liber: Paix, Développement, Démocratie, t. 1, Bruylant, Bruxelles 1998.
dcterms.referencesDugard J., Raič D., The role of recognition in the law and practice of secession [w:] M.G. Kohen (red.), Secession: International Law Perspectives, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2006.
dcterms.referencesDugard J., Recognition and the United Nations, Grotius Publications Ltd., Cambridge 1987.
dcterms.referencesDugard J., Rhodesia: Does South Africa Recognize It as an Independent State, „The South African Law Journal”, 1977, t. 94, nr 2.
dcterms.referencesDugard J., South Africa’s «independent» Homelands: An Exercise in Denationalization, „Denver Journal of International Law and Policy”, 1980, t. 10.
dcterms.referencesDupuy P.M., The International Law of State Responsibility: Revolution or Evolution?, „Michigan Journal of International Law”, 1989, t. 11, nr 1.
dcterms.referencesDuursma J., Fragmentation and the International Relations of Micro-states: Self Determination and Statehood, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1996.
dcterms.referencesDynia E., Uznanie państwa powstałego w drodze secesji [w:] J. Menkes, E. Wacinkiewicz-Cała (red.), Państwo i terytorium w prawie międzynarodowym, Wydawnictwo C.H. Beck, Warszawa 2015.
dcterms.referencesDynia E., Uznanie państwa przez organizację międzynarodową, „Rzeszowskie Zeszyty Naukowe. Prawo i Ekonomia” 1996, nr 19.
dcterms.referencesDynia E., Uznanie państwa w prawie międzynarodowym. Zarys problematyki, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Rzeszowskiego, Rzeszów 2017.
dcterms.referencesEconomides C., Consular relations [w:] R. Bernhardt (red.), Max Planck Encyclopedia of International Law, t. 9, International Relations and Legal Cooperation in General Diplomacy and Consular Relations, Elsevier Science Publishers, Amsterdam 1986.
dcterms.referencesEdeson W.R., Conclusive Executive Certificates in Australian Law, „Australian Year Book of International Law”, 1977, t. 7.
dcterms.referencesEggers A.K., When Is a State a State? The Case for Recognition of Somaliland, „Boston College International and Comparative Law Review”, 2007, t. 30, nr 1.
dcterms.referencesEhrlich L., Prawo narodów, Księgarnia Stefana Kamińskiego, Kraków 1947.
dcterms.referencesEkwe-Ekwe H., The Biafra War: Nigeria and the Aftermath, Edwin Mellen Press Ltd., Lewiston 1990.
dcterms.referencesEl-Ganzory A.E.A., Consular Relations and Unrecognized Regimes, „Revue Égyptienne de Droit International”, 1978, t. 34.
dcterms.referencesElias O.A., The International Status of Taiwan in the Courts of Canada and Singapore, „Singapore Year Book of International Law”, 2004, t. 8.
dcterms.referencesErich R.W., La naissance et la reconnaissance des États, „Recueil des Cours”, 1926, t. 13.
dcterms.referencesFabry M., Recognizing States: International Society and the Establishment of New States Since 1776, Oxford University Press, New York 2010.
dcterms.referencesFarley B.R., Calling a State a State: Somaliland and International Recognition, „Emory International Law Review”, 2010, t. 24, nr 2.
dcterms.referencesFawcett J.E.S., A Reply to Devine, „The Modern Law Review”, 1971, t. 34, nr 4.
dcterms.referencesFawcett J.E.S., Security Council Resolutions on Rhodesia, „British Yearbook of International Law”, 1965, t. 41.
dcterms.referencesFeldman D., International personality, „Recueil des Cours”, 1985, t. 191.
dcterms.referencesFinck F., The State Between Fact and Law: The Role of Recognition and the Conditions Under Which It Is Granted in the Creation of New States, „Polish Yearbook of International Law” 2016, t. 36.
dcterms.referencesFischer G., La non reconnaissance du Transkei, „Annuaire Français de Droit International”, 1976, t. 22.
dcterms.referencesFranck T.M., The Power of Legitimacy Among Nations, Oxford University Press, Oxford–New York 1990.
dcterms.referencesFrankowska M., Artykuły Komisji Prawa Międzynarodowego dotyczące odpowiedzialności państw – nowa forma kodyfikacji prawa międzynarodowego? [w:] J. Menkes (red.), Prawo międzynarodowe – problemy i wyzwania. Księga pamiątkowa Profesor Renaty Sonnenfeld-Tomporek, Wyższa Szkoła Handlu i Prawa im. Ryszarda Łazarskiego w Warszawie, Warszawa 2006.
dcterms.referencesFrankowska M., Prawo traktatów, Szkoła Główna Handlowa w Warszawie – Oficyna Wydawnicza, Warszawa 2007.
dcterms.referencesFrowein J.A., Das de facto-Regime im Völkerrecht, Carl Heymanns Verlag, Köln–Berlin 1968.
dcterms.referencesFrowein J.A., Non-Recognition [w:] R. Wolfrum (red.), Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law, Oxford University Press, Oxford 2011, http://opil.ouplaw.com.
dcterms.referencesFugh J.L., International Law – Deportation – Effect of Non-Recognition of Communist China upon the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 – United States ex rel. Tom Man v. Murff, 264 F.2d 926 (2d Cir. 1959), „The George Washington Law Review”, 1959–1960, t. 28.
dcterms.referencesGaeta P., The Dayton Agreements and International Law, „European Journal of International Law”, 1996, t. 7, nr 2.
dcterms.referencesGandolfi A., Les mouvements de libération nationale, Presses universitaires de France, Paris 1989.
dcterms.referencesGardner A.M., Democratic Governance and Non-State Actors, Palgrave Macmillan, New York 2011.
dcterms.referencesGazzini T., Considerations on the Conflict in Chechnya, „Human Rights Law Journal”, 1996, t. 17, nr 1–2.
dcterms.referencesGeldenhuys D., Contested States in World Politics, Palgrave Macmillan, London 2009.
dcterms.referencesGé rard-Libois J., Sécession au Katanga, Institut National d’Études Politiques, Lé opoldville 1964.
dcterms.referencesGinsburgs G., Slusser R.M., A Calendar of Soviet Treaties: 1958–1973, Sijthoff & Noordhoff, Alphen aan den Rijn 1981.
dcterms.referencesGioia A., Kosovo’s Statehood and the Role of Recognition, „The Italian Yearbook of International Law”, 2008, t. XVIII.
dcterms.referencesGiustozzi A., Empires of Mud: War and Warlords in Afghanistan, Columbia University Press, New York 2009.
dcterms.referencesGoldberg J., Kostiner J., Kuwait (Al-Kuwayt), „Middle East Contemporary Survey”, 1990, t. 14.
dcterms.referencesGoodwin M., From Province to Protectorate to State: Sovereignty Lost, Sovereignty Gained? [w:] J. Summers (red.), Kosovo: A Precedent? – The Declaration of Independence, the Advisory Opinion and Implications for Statehood, Self-Determination and Minority Rights, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Leiden–Boston 2011.
dcterms.referencesGóralczyk W., Sawicki S., Prawo międzynarodowe publiczne w zarysie, Wydawnictwo Prawnicze LexisNexis, Warszawa 2007.
dcterms.referencesGowlland-Debbas V., Collective Responses to Illegal Acts in International Law: United Nations Action in the Question of Southern Rhodesia, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Dordrecht 1990.
dcterms.referencesGowlland-Debbas V., Implementing Sanctions Resolutions in Domestic Law [w:] V. Gowlland-Debbas, National Implementation of United Nations Sanctions: A Comparative Study, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Leiden–Boston 2004.
dcterms.referencesGraham M.W., The Diplomatic Recognition of the Border States, Part II: Estonia, University of California Press, Berkeley 1939.
dcterms.referencesGraney K., Chechnya [w:] T. Bahcheli, B. Bartmann, H. Srebrnik (red.), De Facto States: The quest for sovereignty, Routledge, London–New York 2004.
dcterms.referencesGrant T.D., A Panel of Experts for Chechnya: Purposes and Prospects in Light of International Law, „Virginia Journal of International Law”, 1999, t. 40, nr 1.
dcterms.referencesGrant T.D., Admission to the United Nations: Charter Article 4 and the Rise of Universal Organization, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Leiden–Boston 2009.
dcterms.referencesGrant T.D., Current Development: Afghanistan Recognizes Chechnya, „American University International Law Review”, 2000, t. 13, nr 4.
dcterms.referencesGrant T.D., Territorial Status, Recognition, and Statehood: Some Aspects of the Genocide Case (Bosnia and Herzegovina v. Yugoslavia), „Stanford Journal of International Law”, 1997, t. 33, nr 2.
dcterms.referencesGrant T.D., The Recognition of States. Law and Practice in Debate and Evolution, Praeger Publishers, Westport 1999.
dcterms.referencesGrant T.D., Who Can Make Treaties? Other Subjects of International Law [w:] D.B. Hollis (red.), The Oxford Guide to Treaties, Oxford University Press, Oxford 2012.
dcterms.referencesGrzegorczyk P., Immunitet państwa w postępowaniu cywilnym, Wolters Kluwer Polska, Warszawa 2010.
dcterms.referencesHadji P.S., The Case for Kurdish Statehood in Iraq, „Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law”, 2015, t. 41, nr 2.
dcterms.referencesHall W.E., International Law, Clarendon Press, Oxford 1880.
dcterms.referencesHannum H., The Status of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights in National and International Law, „Georgia Journal of International and Comparative Law”, 1996, t. 25, nr 1.
dcterms.referencesHarvard Law School, Research in International Law. Part II: The Legal Position and Functions of Consuls, „American Journal of International Law. Special Supplement”, 1932, t. 26.
dcterms.referencesHasbi A., Les mouvements de libération nationale et le droit international, Éditions Stouky, Rabat 1981.
dcterms.referencesHawkins E.D., An Approach to Issues of International Law Raised by United States Actions in Vietnam [w:] R.A. Falk (red.), The Vietnam War and International Law, t. 1, Princeton University Press, Princeton 1969.
dcterms.referencesHervey J.G., The Legal Effects of Recognition in International Law as Interpreted by the Courts of the United States, Wiliam S. Hein & Co., Inc., Buffalo 1974.
dcterms.referencesHeydt D.A., Nonrecognition of the Independence of Transkei, „Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law”, 1978, t. 10.
dcterms.referencesHiggins R., Democracy and the United Nations, „Cambridge Journal of International and Comparative Law”, 2015, t. 4, nr 2.
dcterms.referencesHill C., Recent Policies of Non-Recognition, „International Conciliation”, 1933, t. 293.
dcterms.referencesHille S., Mutual Recognition of Croatia and Serbia (+Montenegro), „The European Journal of International Law”, 1995, t. 6, nr 1.
dcterms.referencesHille S., Völkerrechtliche Probleme der Staatenanerkennung bei den ehemaligen jugoslawischen Teilrepubliken, Verlag V. Florentz, München 1996.
dcterms.referencesHillgruber C., Die Aufnahme neuer Staaten in die Völkerrechtsgemeinschaft. Das völkerrechtliche Institut der Anerkennung von Neustaaten in der Praxis des 19. und 20. Jahrhunderts, Peter Lang GmbH, Frankfurt am Main 1998.
dcterms.referencesHillgruber C., The Admission of New States to the International Community, „The European Journal of International Law”, 1998, t. 9, nr 3.
dcterms.referencesHo P.S.C., The Impact of the U.N. Fish Stocks Agreement on Taiwan’s Participation in International Fisheries Fora, „Ocean Development & International Law”, 2006, t. 31, nr 2.
dcterms.referencesHögger D., The Recognition of States: A Study on the Historical Developments in Doctrine and Practice with a Special Focus on the Requirements, LIT Verlag, Zürich 2015.
dcterms.referencesHollis D.B., Accountability in Chechnya – Addressing Internal Matters With Legal and Political International Norms, „Boston College Law Review”, 1995, t. 36, nr 4.
dcterms.referencesHorng D.C., Taiwan Practices in the WTO Main Activities: 2002–2015, „Chinese (Taiwan) Yearbook of International Law and Affairs”, 2015, t. 33.
dcterms.referencesHoughton N.D., The Responsibility of the State for the Acts and Obligations of Local de Facto Governments and Revolutionists, „Minnesota Law Review”, 1929, t. 14.
dcterms.referencesHoughton N.D., The Responsibility of the States for the Acts and Obligations of General De Facto Governments – Importance of Recognition, „Indiana Law Journal”, 1931, t. 6, nr 7.
dcterms.referencesHsieh P.L., An Unrecognized State in Foreign and International Courts: The Case of the Republic of China on Taiwan, „Michigan Journal of International Law”, 2007, t. 28, nr 4.
dcterms.referencesHuang K.B., Taiwan’s foreign policy and international space [w:] G. Schubert (red.), Routledge Handbook of Contemporary Taiwan, Routledge, London–New York 2016.
dcterms.referencesHudson D.E., Recognition of Foreign Governments and Its Effect on Private Rights, „Missouri Law Review”, 1936, t. 1, nr 4.
dcterms.referencesHyde C.C., International Law. Chiefly as Interpreted and Applied by the United States, t. 1, Little, Brown and Co., Boston 1922.
dcterms.referencesHyde C.C., The Status of the Republic of Indonesia in International Law, „Columbia Law Review”, 1949, t. 49, nr 7.
dcterms.referencesIjalaye D.A., Was „Biafra” at Any Time a State in International Law?, „The American Journal of International Law”, 1971, t. 65, nr 3.
dcterms.referencesIoannidis M., Naming a State – Disputing over Symbols of Statehood at the Example of ‘Macedonia,’ „Max Planck Yearbook of United Nations Law”, 2010, t. 14.
dcterms.referencesJackson R., Sørensen G., Wprowadzenie do stosunków międzynarodowych. Teorie i kierunki badawcze, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego, Kraków 2006.
dcterms.referencesJaffe L.L., Judicial Aspects of Foreign Relations, in Particular of the Recognition of Foreign Powers, Harvard University Press, Cambridge 1933.
dcterms.referencesJamnejad M., Wood M., The Principle of Non-intervention, „Leiden Journal of International Law”, 2009, t. 22, nr 2.
dcterms.referencesJanev I., Legal Aspects of the Use of a Provisional Name for Macedonia in the United Nations System, „The American Journal of International Law”, 1999, t. 93, nr 1.
dcterms.referencesJauffret J.C., Afganistan 2001–2013, Wydawnictwo Akademickie Dialog, Warszawa 2014.
dcterms.referencesJellinek G., Allgemeine Staatslehre, Verlag von O. Häring, Berlin 1914.
dcterms.referencesJennings R.Y., General course on principles of international law, „Recueil des Cours”, 1967, t. 121.
dcterms.referencesJones R.A., The British Diplomatic Service: 1815–1914, Wilfrid Laurier University Press, Waterloo 1983.
dcterms.referencesJones R.A., The Soviet Concept of ‘Limited Sovereignty’ from Lenin to Gorbachev: The Brezhnev Doctrine, Palgrave Macmillan, New York 1990.
dcterms.referencesJureńczyk Ł., Wojna z Talibami i Al-Kaidą. Afganistan w latach 1994–2012, Wydawnictwo Naukowe Grado, Toruń 2013.
dcterms.referencesK.B. (autor anonimowy), Few New Aspects to Soviet-Japanese Friction, „Far Eastern Survey”, 1938, t. 7, nr 11.
dcterms.referencesKaczorowska-Ireland A., Public International Law, Routledge, Abingdon 2015.
dcterms.referencesKadelbach S., Jus Cogens, Obligations Erga Omnes and other Rules – The Identification of Fundamental Norms [w:] C. Tomuschat, J.M. Thouvenin (red.), The Fundamental Rules of the International Legal Order: Jus Cogens and Obligations Erga Omnes, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Leiden–Boston 2006.
dcterms.referencesKattenburg P.M., Indonesia [w:] P.H. Kratoska (red.), South East Asia: Colonial History, vol. VI. Independence through Revolutionary War, Routledge, London 2001.
dcterms.referencesKao S.M., Fishing Entity in International Law: An Analysis of Taiwan’s Practice in the Pacific Ocean, „Journal of the Fisheries Society of Taiwan”, 2012, t. 39, nr 3.
dcterms.referencesKardaś S., Problem uznania państwa w prawie międzynarodowym na przykładzie Republiki Górnego Karabachu, „Stosunki Międzynarodowe”, 2007, t. 35, nr 1–2.
dcterms.referencesKelsen H., Recognition in International Law: Theoretical Observations, „The American Journal of International Law”, 1941, t. 35, nr 4.
dcterms.referencesKelsen H., Théorie générale du droit international public. Problèmes choisis, „Recueil des Cours”, 1932, t. 42.
dcterms.referencesKersel M.M., Fractured oversight: The ABCs of cultural heritage in Palestine after the Oslo Accords, „Journal of Social Archaeology” 2015, t. 15, nr 1.
dcterms.referencesKessler O., dos Reis F., Constructivism and the Politics of International law [w:] A. Orford, F. Hoffmann, M. Clark (red.), The Oxford handbook of the theory of international law, Oxford University Press, Oxford 2016.
dcterms.referencesKleczkowska A., Palestyna – państwo nieuznawane, „Stosunki Międzynarodowe – International Relations”, 2016, t. 52, nr 1.
dcterms.referencesKleczkowska A., Status Palestyny w Organizacji Narodów Zjednoczonych, „Przegląd Prawniczy, Ekonomiczny i Społeczny” 2013, nr 1.
dcterms.referencesKohen M., The Principle of Non-Intervention 25 Years after the Nicaragua Judgment, „Leiden Journal of International Law”, 2012, t. 25, nr 1.
dcterms.referencesKokott J., Pueblo Incident [w:] R. Bernhardt (red.), Max Planck Encyclopedia of International Law, t. 11, Elsevier Science Publishers, Amsterdam 1986.
dcterms.referencesKolstø P., The Sustainability and Future of Unrecognized Quasi-States, „Journal of Peace Research” 2006, t. 43, nr 6.
dcterms.referencesKomarnicki T., Uznanie międzynarodowe i powstanie reprezentacji dyplomatycznej nowych państw: szkic historyczno-prawny, Wydawnictwo „Przeglądu Dyplomatycznego”, Warszawa 1921.
dcterms.referencesKondrakiewicz D., Uznanie międzynarodowe jako instrument współistnienia, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Marii Curie-Skłodowskiej, Lublin 1991.
dcterms.referencesKorowicz M.S., Introduction to International Law: Present Conceptions of International Law in Theory and Practice, Springer-Science+Business Media, B.V., Dordrecht 1959.
dcterms.referencesKorowicz M.S., Some Present Aspects of Sovereignty in International Law, „Recueil des Cours”, 1961, t. 102.
dcterms.referencesKosicki A., Wpływ uznania międzynarodowego na podmiotowość państwa, „Prawo i Administracja”, 2007, t. 6.
dcterms.referencesKosienkowski M., Współpraca społeczności międzynarodowej z państwami de facto. Studium przypadków, Wydawnictwo KUL, Lublin 2018.
dcterms.referencesKoskenmäki R., Legal Implications Resulting from State Failure in Light of the Case of Somalia, „Nordic Journal of International Law”, 2004, t. 73, nr 1.
dcterms.referencesKowalski M., Ius ad bellum a systemowy charakter prawa międzynarodowego [w:] R. Kwiecień (red.), Państwo a prawo międzynarodowe jako system prawa, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Marii Curie-Skłodowskiej, Lublin 2015.
dcterms.referencesKramer M., The Prague Spring and the Soviet Invasion in Historical Perspective [w:] G. Bischof, S. Karner, P. Ruggenthaler (red.), The Prague Uprising and the Warsaw Pact Invasion of Czechoslovakia in 1968, Lexington Books, Lanham 2010.
dcterms.referencesKreijen G., State Failure, Sovereignty and Effectiveness: Legal Lessons from the Decolonization of Sub-Saharan Africa, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Leiden–Boston 2004.
dcterms.referencesKułaga Ł., Uznanie państwa : między teorią a praktyką, „Kwartalnik Prawa Publicznego”, 2012, t. 12, nr 1.
dcterms.referencesKunz J.L., Die Anerkennung von Staaten und Regierungen im Völkerrecht, Verlag von W. Kohlhammer, Stuttgart 1928.
dcterms.referencesKuta T., Uznanie, Wydawnictwo Morskie, Gdańsk 1973.
dcterms.referencesKutrzeba S., Polskie prawo polityczne według traktatów, t. 1: Traktaty, suwerenność, terytorjum, ludność, ograniczenia (mniejszości, wolności handlowe), Skład Główny w Księgarniach Gebethnera i Wolffa, Kraków 1923.
dcterms.referencesKwiecień R., Suwerenność państwa. Rekonstrukcja i znaczenie idei w prawie międzynarodowym, Kantor Wydawniczy Zakamycze, Kraków 2009.
dcterms.referencesLachs M., Recognition and Modern Methods of International Co-Operation, „British Yearbook of International Law”, 1959, t. 35.
dcterms.referencesLaurinavičiūtė L., Biekša L., The relevance of remedial secession in the post-Soviet ‘frozen conflicts,’ „International Comparative Jurisprudence”, 2015, t. 1, nr 1.
dcterms.referencesLauterpacht H., Recognition in International Law, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1947.
dcterms.referencesLauterpacht H., Recognition of States in International Law, „Yale Law Journal”, 1944, t. 53, nr 3.
dcterms.referencesLazarus C., Le statut des mouvements de libération nationale à l’Organisation des Nations Unies, „Annuaire Français de Droit International”, 1974, t. 20, nr 1.
dcterms.referencesLe Normand R., La reconnaissance internationale et ses diverses applications, Imprimerie Camis et Cie, Paris 1899.
dcterms.referencesLee L.T., Consular Status under Unrecognized Regimes, with Particular Reference to Recent United States Practice, „British Yearbook of International Law”, 1955, t. 32.
dcterms.referencesLee L.T., Quigley J., Consular Law and Practice, Oxford University Press, Oxford 2008.
dcterms.referencesLee T.B., Quasi-Diplomatic Relations of the Republic of China: Their Development and Status in International Law, „Issues & Studies”, 1988, t. 24, nr 7.
dcterms.referencesLegucka A., Geopolityczne uwarunkowana i konsekwencje konfliktów zbrojnych na obszarze poradzieckim, Difin, Warszawa 2013.
dcterms.referencesLeigh M., United States of America [w:] E. Lauterpacht, J.G. Collier (red.), Individual Rights and the State in Foreign Affairs. An International Compendium, Praeger Publishers, New York 1977.
dcterms.referencesLemkin R., Axis rule in occupied Europe: laws of occupation, analysis of government, proposals for redress, Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, Washington 1944.
dcterms.referencesLepe S.N., Britain’s Recognition of Bangladesh as a State In 1972, „Journal of Social Sciences and Humanity Studies” 2017, t. 3, nr 1.
dcterms.referencesLewis J.M., Understanding Somalia and Somaliland: Culture, History, Society, Columbia University Press, New York 2008.
dcterms.referencesLi V.H., De-Recognizing Taiwan: The Legal Problems, Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, Washington 1977.
dcterms.referencesLoudwin B., Die konkludente Anerkennung im Völkerrecht, Duncker & Humblot, Berlin 1983.
dcterms.referencesLowenberg H., Israel, „American Jewish Year Book”, 1950, t. 51.
dcterms.referencesLucarelli S., Europe and the Breakup of Yugoslavia: A Political Failure in Search of a Scholarly Explanation, Kluwer Law International, The Hague 2000.
dcterms.referencesLynch D., Engaging Eurasia’s Separatist States: Unresolved Conflicts and De Facto States, United States Institute for Peace Press, Washington 2004.
dcterms.referencesLyon A.H.E., The Principality of Sealand, and Its Case for Sovereign Recognition, „Emory International Law Review”, 2014, t. 29, nr 3.
dcterms.referencesLyons A.B., Conclusiveness of the Statements of the Executive: Continental and Latin-American Practice, „British Yearbook of International Law”, 1948, t. 25.
dcterms.referencesLyons A.B., The Conclusiveness of the ‘Suggestion’ and Certificate of the American State Department, „British Yearbook of International Law”, 1947, t. 24.
dcterms.referencesLyou B.H., Peace and Unification in Korea and International Law, „University of Maryland School of Law Occasional Papers / Reprints Series in Contemporary Asian Studies”, 1986, t. 73, nr 2.
dcterms.referencesLytle P.F., Loyalty and Recognition under Challenge: The Yugoslav Case 1941–1945 [w:] Y. Shain (red.), Governments-in-Exile in Contemporary World Politics, Routledge, New York–London 1991.
dcterms.referencesMalanczuk P., Akehurst’s Modern Introduction to International Law, Routledge, London–New York 1997.
dcterms.referencesMann F.A., Germany’s Present Legal Status Revisited, „International and Comparative Law Quarterly”, 1967, t. 16, nr 3.
dcterms.referencesMann F.A., The Judicial Recognition of an Unrecognised State, „International and Comparative Law Quarterly”, 1987, t. 36, nr 2.
dcterms.referencesMansour R., Rethinking Recognition: The Case of Iraqi Kurdistan, „Cambridge Journal of International and Comparative Law”, 2014, t. 3, nr 4.
dcterms.referencesMaogoto J.N., Somaliland: Scrambled by International Law? [w:] D. French (red.), Statehood and Self-Determination: Reconciling Tradition and Modernity in International Law, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2013.
dcterms.referencesMarcinko M., Między humanitaryzmem a koniecznością wojskową – znaczenie zasady proporcjonalności w planowaniu i prowadzeniu operacji militarnych, „Polski Rocznik Praw Człowieka i Prawa Humanitarnego”, nr 6.
dcterms.referencesMarek K., Identity and Continuity of States in Public International Law, Librairie Droz, Genève 1968.
dcterms.referencesMartsenko N., Peculiarities of Recognition of Judgments and other Acts Issued by Unrecognized Authorities – The Example of the Autonomous Republic of Crimea, and Luhansk and Donetsk Oblasts (“LNR” and “DNR”), „Osteuropa-Recht” 2019, t. 65, nr 2.
dcterms.referencesMcNair A.D., The Stimson Doctrine of Non-Recognition: A Note on Its Legal Aspects, „British Yearbook of International Law”, 1933, t. 14.
dcterms.referencesMcWhinney E., New international law and international law making: new thinking on recognition and State succession, „Chinese (Taiwan) Yearbook of International Law and Affairs”, 1997, t. 16.
dcterms.referencesMeloni C., Tognoni G., Selected Materials from the International Conference ‘Is There a Court for Gaza?’, 22 May 2009, Rome [w:] C. Meloni, G. Tognoni (red.), Is There a Court for Gaza?: A Test Bench for International Justice , T.M.C. Asser Press, The Hague 2012.
dcterms.referencesMenon P.K., The Law of Recognition in International Law: Basic Principles, Edwin Mellen Press Ltd., Lewiston 1994.
dcterms.referencesMezglewski A., Stolica Apostolska i Państwo Watykańskie jako podmioty prawa międzynarodowego, „Studia z Prawa Wyznaniowego” 2005, t. 8.
dcterms.referencesMiddlebush F.A., International Affairs: The Effect of the Non-Recognition of Manchukuo, „The American Political Science Review”, 1934, t. 28, nr 4.
dcterms.referencesMiddlebush F.A., Non-recognition as a Sanction in International Law, „Proceedings of the American Society of International Law at Its Annual Meeting”, 1933, t. 27.
dcterms.referencesMielnik B., Kształtowanie się pozapaństwowej podmiotowości w prawie międzynarodowym, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Wrocławskiego, Wrocław 2008.
dcterms.referencesMielnik B., Stolica Apostolska i Watykan – podmiotowość w prawie międzynarodowym, „Przegląd Prawa i Administracji” 2007, t. 76.
dcterms.referencesMielnik B., Udział pozapaństwowych podmiotów w rozwoju prawa międzynarodowego [w:] J. Kolasa, A. Kozłowski (red.), Rozwój prawa międzynarodowego – jedność czy fragmentacja?, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Wrocławskiego, Wrocław 2007.
dcterms.referencesMielus K., Legal Status of Palestine’s Enhanced Status in the UN General Assembly, „Polish Review of International and European Law”, 2014, t. 3, nr 1–2.
dcterms.referencesMikhelidze N., The Geneva Talks over Georgia’s Territorial Conflicts: Achievements and Challenges, „Documenti IAI”, 2010, t. 25.
dcterms.referencesMikša K., Consequences of Non-Recognition of State in Private International Law from the Polish Perspective, „Osteuropa-Recht” 2016, t. 62, nr 2.
dcterms.referencesMilano E., The Intractable Case of Northern Kosovo in the Light of the 2013 Brussels Agreement [w:] M. Nicolini, F. Palermo, E. Milano (red.), Law, Territory and Conflict Resolution: Law as a Problem and Law as a Solution, Brill Nijhoff, Leiden–Boston 2016.
dcterms.referencesMilano E., Unlawful Territorial Situations in International Law: Reconciling Effectiveness, Legality and Legitimacy, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Leiden–Boston 2006.
dcterms.referencesMilanović M., Extraterritorial Application of Human Rights Treaties: Law, Principles, and Policy, Oxford University Press, Oxford 2011.
dcterms.referencesMilanović M., State Responsibility for Genocide, „The European Journal of International Law”, 2006, t. 17, nr 3.
dcterms.referencesMirćev D., Engineering the foreign policy of a new independent State: the Case of Macedonia, 1990–6 [w:] J. Pettifer (red.), The New Macedonian Question, Macmillan Press Ltd., Basingstoke 1999.
dcterms.referencesMizushima T., The Settlement of a Private Person‘s Claim against a Foreign ’State‘: The Case of Japan’s Foreign State Immunity Act, „Chinese (Taiwan) Yearbook of International Law and Affairs”, 2012, t. 30.
dcterms.referencesMoore J.B., A Digest of International Law, Government Printing Office, Washington 1906.
dcterms.referencesMoore J.B., History and Digest of the International Arbitrations to which the United States has been a Party, Government Printing Office, Washington 1898, t. III.
dcterms.referencesMoore J.N., International Law and the United States Role in the Viet Nam War: A Reply [w:] R.A. Falk (red.), The Vietnam War and International Law, t. 1, Princeton University Press, Princeton 1969.
dcterms.referencesMoore J.N., The Role of the State Department in Judicial Proceedings, „Fordham Law Review”, 1962, t. 31.
dcterms.referencesMoulin P., Expériences récentes de non-reconnaissance en droit international, Bosc Frères M. & L. Riou, Lyon 1938.
dcterms.referencesMurphy M.M., Somalia: The New Barbary? Piracy and Islam in the Horn of Africa, Hurst & Company, London 2011.
dcterms.referencesMuszyński J., Skibiński J., Uznanie NRD. Prawne, polityczne i gospodarcze aspekty mie̜dzynarodowej podmiotowości Niemieckiej Republiki Demokratycznej, PWN, Warszawa 1973.
dcterms.referencesMuszyński M., Państwo w prawie międzynarodowym. Istota, rodzaje i atrybuty, Wydawnictwo STO, Bielsko-Biała 2011.
dcterms.referencesNaldi G.J., Separatism in the Comoros: Some Legal Aspects, „Leiden Journal of International Law”, 1998, t. 11, nr 2.
dcterms.referencesNaldi J., The Organization of African Unity and the Saharan Arab Democratic Republic, „Journal of African Law” 1982, t. 26, nr 2.
dcterms.referencesNdikumana L., Emizet K.F., The Economics of Civil War: The Case of the Democratic Republic of Congo [w:] P. Collier, N. Sambanis (red.), Understanding Civil War. Evidence and Analysis, The World Bank, Washington 2005.
dcterms.referencesNecatigil Z.M., The Cyprus Question and the Turkish Position in International Law, Oxford University Press, Oxford 1989.
dcterms.referencesNkala J., The United Nations, International Law, and the Rhodesian Independence Crisis, Clarendon Press, Oxford 1985.
dcterms.referencesNowicki M.A., Wokół Konwencji Europejskiej: Komentarz do Europejskiej Konwencji Praw Człowieka, Wolters Kluwer Polska SA, Warszawa 2013.
dcterms.referencesO’Connell D.P., International Law, t. 1, Stevens & Sons, London 1970.
dcterms.referencesObieta J.A., The International Status of the Suez Canal, Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague 1970.
dcterms.referencesOeter S., De Facto Regimes in International Law [w:] W. Czapliński, A. Kleczkowska (red.), Unrecognised Subjects in International Law, Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar, Warszawa 2019.
dcterms.referencesOeter S., The Dismemberment of Yugoslavia: An Update on Bosnia and Herzegovina, Kosovo and Montenegro, „German Yearbook of International Law” 2007, t. 50.
dcterms.referencesOeter S., The Kosovo Case – An Unfortunate Precedent, „Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht”, 2015, t. 75.
dcterms.referencesOnuf N., The Constitution of International Society, „European Journal of International Law” 1994, t. 5, nr 1.
dcterms.referencesOnuf N.G., World of Our Making: Rules and Rule in Social Theory and International Relations, University of South Carolina Press, Columbia 1989.
dcterms.referencesOppenheim L., International Law. A Treatise, t. I: Peace, Longmans, Green & Co., London 1912.
dcterms.referencesOppenheim L., Roxburgh R.F., International Law. A Treatise, t. I: Peace, Longmans, Green & Co., London 1921.
dcterms.referencesOppenheimer F.E., Governments and Authorities in Exile, „The American Journal of International Law”, 1942, t. 36, nr 4.
dcterms.referencesOraison A., L’obligation de non-reconnaissance de l’État d’Anjouan, „Revue de Droit International, de Sciences Diplomatiques et Politiques”, 1998, t. 76, nr 2.
dcterms.referencesOrakhelashvili A., Peremptory Norms in International Law, Oxford University Press, Oxford 2006.
dcterms.referencesOrakhelashvili A., Statehood, Recognition and the United Nations System: A Unilateral Declaration of Independence of Kosovo, „Max Planck Yearbook of United Nations Law”, 2008, t. 12.
dcterms.referencesOrakhelashvili A., The dynamics of statehood in the practice of international and English courts [w:] C. Chinkin, F. Baetens (red.), Sovereignty, Statehood and State Responsibility: Essays in Honour of James Crawford, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2015.
dcterms.referencesOsiejewicz J., Lex petrolea jako autonomiczny reżim prawny prawa międzynarodowego, „Ruch Prawniczy, Ekonomiczny i Socjologiczny” 2015, t. 77, nr 4.
dcterms.referencesOtto J.G., Słowo wstępne [w:] J.G. Otto (red.), Demokratyczne i niedemokratyczne reżimy polityczne, Dom Wydawniczy Elipsa, Warszawa 2015.
dcterms.referencesParfitt R., Theorizing Recognition and International Personality [w:] A. Orford, F. Hoffmann (red.), The Oxford Handbook of the Theory of International Law, Oxford University Press, Oxford 2016.
dcterms.referencesPartan D.G., Legal Aspects of the Vietnam Conflict [w:] R.A. Falk (red.), The Vietnam War and International Law, t. 1, Princeton University Press, Princeton 1969.
dcterms.referencesPatel S.R., Recognition in the Law of Nations, N.M. Tripathi Private Ltd. Law Publishers, Bombay 1959.
dcterms.referencesPaxson F.L., The Independence of The South-American Republics. A Study in Recognition and Foreign Policy, Cooper Square Publishers, New York 1970.
dcterms.referencesPaye O., Remacle E., The United Nations and the CSCE: Facing Conflicts in Abkhazia and Nagorno-Karabakh, „Peace and the Sciences”, 1994, t. 25.
dcterms.referencesPegg S., International society and the de facto state, Ashgate, Aldershot 1998.
dcterms.referencesPellet A., The Opinions of the Badinter Arbitration Committee. A Second Breath for the Self-Determination of Peoples, „The European Journal of International Law”, 1992, t. 3, nr 1.
dcterms.referencesPerkowski M., Samostanowienie narodów w prawie międzynarodowym, Wydawnictwa Prawnicze PWN, Warszawa 2001.
dcterms.referencesPeterson M.J., Recognition of Governments: Legal Doctrine and State Practice, 1815–1995, Macmillan Press Ltd., Basingstoke 1997.
dcterms.referencesPfluger F., Die einseitigen Rechtsgeschäfte im Völkerrecht, Schulthess, Zürich 1936
dcterms.referencesPomerance M., The Badinter Commission: The Use and Misuse of the International Court of Justice’s Jurisprudence, „Michigan Journal of International Law” 1998, t. 20, nr 1.
dcterms.referencesPortmann R., Legal Personality in International Law, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2010.
dcterms.referencesPovažan M., Slovakia 1939–1945: Statehood and International Recognition (De Iure or De Facto Statehood?), „UNISCI Discussion Papers”, 2014, nr 36.
dcterms.referencesPremdas R.R., Bougainville: the quest for self-determination [w:] T. Bahcheli, B. Bartmann, H. Srebrnik (red.), De Facto States: The quest for sovereignty, Routledge, London–New York 2004.
dcterms.referencesPustorino P., Failed States and International Law: The Impact of UN Practice on Somalia in Respect of Fundamental Rules of International Law, „The German Yearbook of International Law”, 2010, t. 53.
dcterms.referencesQuigley J., The Case for Palestine: An International Law Perspective, Duke University Press, Durham–London 2005.
dcterms.referencesQuigley J., The Palestine Declaration to the International Criminal Court: The Statehood Issue [w:] C. Meloni, G. Tognoni (red.), Is There a Court for Gaza?: A Test Bench for International Justice, T.M.C. Asser Press, The Hague 2012.
dcterms.referencesQuigley J., Palestine Statehood: A Rejoinder to Professor Robert Weston Ash [w:] C. Meloni, G. Tognoni (red.), Is There a Court for Gaza?: A Test Bench for Inter- national Justice, T.M.C. Asser Press, The Hague 2012.
dcterms.referencesRadan P., Secessionist Self-Determination: The Cases of Slovenia and Croatia [w:] R. Petković (red.), International Law and the Changed Yugoslavia, Institute of International Politics and Economics, Belgrade 1995.
dcterms.referencesRadan P., The Break-up of Yugoslavia and International Law, Routledge, London–New York 2002.
dcterms.referencesRaič D., Statehood and the Law of Self-Determination, Kluwer Law International, The Hague 2002.
dcterms.referencesRead M., Marsh D., Łączenie metod ilościowych z jakościowymi [w:] D. Marsh, G. Stoker (red.), Teorie i metody w naukach politycznych , Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego, Kraków 2006.
dcterms.referencesReisman W.M., Why Regime Change is (Almost Always) a Bad Idea, „The American Journal of International Law” 2004, t. 98, nr 3.
dcterms.referencesReus-Smit C., Konstruktywizm [w:] S. Burchill i in. (red.), Teorie stosunków międzynarodowych, Książka i Wiedza, Warszawa 2006.
dcterms.referencesRich R., Recognition of States: The Collapse of Yugoslavia and the Soviet Union, „The European Journal of International Law”, 1993, t. 4, nr 1.
dcterms.referencesRichardson III H.J., Self-Determination, International Law and the South African Bantustan Policy, „Columbia Journal of Transnational Law”, 1978, t. 17.
dcterms.referencesRiphagen W., The relationship between public and private law and the rules of conflict of laws, „Recueil des Cours”, 1961, t. 102.
dcterms.referencesRonen Y., Recognition of Divorce without Recognition of Statehood, „Cambridge Law Journal”, 2004, t. 63, nr 2.
dcterms.referencesRonen Y., Transition from Illegal Regimes under International Law, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2011.
dcterms.referencesRooney J.M., The Relationship between Jurisdiction and Attribution after Jaloud v. Netherlands, „Netherlands International Law Review”, 2015, t. 62, nr 3.
dcterms.referencesRoth B.R., Governmental Illegitimacy in International Law, Clarendon Press, Oxford 1999.
dcterms.referencesRoth B.R., The Entity that Dare Not Speak Its Name: Unrecognized Taiwan as a Right-Bearer in the International Legal Order, „East Asia Law Review”, 2009, t. 4, nr 1.
dcterms.referencesRubin A.P., Some Legal Implications of the Pueblo Incident, „The International and Comparative Law Quarterly”, 1969, t. 18, nr 4.
dcterms.referencesRubin B.P., The Search for Peace in Afghanistan. From Buffer State to Failed State, Yale University Press, New Haven–London 1995.
dcterms.referencesSaganek P., Akty jednostronne państw a problematyka źródeł prawa międzynarodowego [w:] B. Mielnik (red.), Z problematyki źródeł prawa międzynarodowego, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Wrocławskiego, Wrocław 2017.
dcterms.referencesSaganek P., Akty jednostronne państw w prawie międzynarodowym, Europejska Wyższa Szkoła Prawa i Administracji, Warszawa 2010.
dcterms.referencesSaganek P., Skutki prawne braku uznania rządu w świetle wybranych orzeczeń sądów krajowych [w:] Prawo w XXI wieku. Księga pamiątkowa 50-lecia Instytutu Nauk Prawnych Polskiej Akademii Nauk, Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar, Warszawa 2006.
dcterms.referencesSaganek P., Uwagi w przedmiocie ogólnej teorii uznania [w:] K. Karski (red.), Kierunki rozwoju współczesnego prawa międzynarodowego, Bellona, Warszawa 2015.
dcterms.referencesSaganek P., Uznanie jako akt jednostronny państwa a systemowy charakter prawa międzynarodowego [w:] R. Kwiecień (red.), Państwo a prawo międzynarodowe jako system prawa, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Marii Curie-Skłodowskiej, Lublin 2015.
dcterms.referencesSagay I., Non-Recognition of the Illegal Occupation of Territory, „The Indian Journal of International Law”, 1976, t. 16.
dcterms.referencesSalmon J.J.A., La jurisprudence belge en matière de reconnaissance [w:] Liber Amicorum Elie Van Bogaert, Kluwer Rechtswetenschappen, Antwerpen 1985.
dcterms.referencesSalmon J.J.A., La reconnaissance d’État. Quatre cas: Mandchoukouo, Katanga, Biafra, Rhodésie du Sud, Librairie Armand Colin, Paris 1971.
dcterms.referencesSalmon J.J.A., Naissance et réconnaissance du Bangla-Desh [w:] J. Tittel (red.), Multitudo Legum Ius Unum. Festschrift für Wilhelm Wengler, t. 1, Interrecht, Berlin 1973.
dcterms.referencesSanders A.J.G.M., The Courts and Recognition of Foreign States and Governments, „South African Law Journal”, 1975, t. 92.
dcterms.referencesSastroamidjojo A., Delson R., The Status of the Republic of Indonesia in International Law, „Columbia Law Review”, 1949, t. 49, nr 3.
dcterms.referencesSatow E., Gore-Booth, Lord, Pakenham D., Satow’s Guide to Diplomatic Practice, Longman Publishing Group, London–New York 1994.
dcterms.referencesSautman B., Tibet’s Putative Statehood and International Law, „Chinese Journal of International Law” 2010, t. 9, nr 1.
dcterms.referencesSawicki S., Funkcje konsula. Studium prawno-międzynarodowe, Zakład Narodowy im. Ossolińskich, Wrocław 1992.
dcterms.referencesScelle G., Règles générales du droit de la paix, „Recueil des Cours”, 1933, t. 46.
dcterms.referencesSchabas W.A., The European Convention on Human Rights: A Commentary, Oxford University Press, Oxford 2015.
dcterms.referencesScharf M.P., Accelerated Formation of Customary International Law, „ILSA Journal of International & Comparative Law”, 2014, t. 20.
dcterms.referencesSchoiswohl M., Status and (Human Rights) Obligations of Non-Recognized De Facto Regimes in International Law: The Case of ‘Somaliland,’ Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Leiden–Boston 2004.
dcterms.referencesSchwarzenberger G., Brown E.D., A Manual of International Law, Professional Books Limited, London 1976.
dcterms.referencesSchwarzenberger G., International Law as Applied by International Courts and Tribunals, t. 1, Stevens & Sons Limited, London 1957.
dcterms.referencesSchwelb E., The Nuclear Test Ban Treaty and International Law, „American Journal of International Law”, 1964, t. 58, nr 3.
dcterms.referencesScobbie I., Some Common Heresies about International Law: Sundry Theoretical Perspectives [w:] M.D. Evans (red.), International Law, Oxford University Press, Oxford 2003.
dcterms.referencesSen B., A Diplomat’s Handbook of International Law and Practice, Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague 1965.
dcterms.referencesSereni A.P., Agency in International Law, „The American Journal of International Law”, 1940, t. 34, nr 4.
dcterms.referencesShaelou S.L., The EU and Cyprus: Principles and Strategies of Full Integration, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Leiden–Boston 2010.
dcterms.referencesShao T.P., Die Anerkennung im Völkerrecht durch die Aufnahme konsularischer Beziehungen, Deutscher Akademischer Austauschdienst, Köln 1967.
dcterms.referencesSharp R.H., Nonrecognition as a legal obligation, 1775–1934, Imprimerie Georges Thone, Liège 1934.
dcterms.referencesShaw M.N., International Law, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2003.
dcterms.referencesShaw M.N., Report by Malcolm N. Shaw: „Re: Order in Council P.C. 1996–1497 of 30 September 1996” [w:] A. Bayefsky (red.), Self-Determination in International Law, Quebec and Lessons Learned, Kluwer Law International, The Hague 2000.
dcterms.referencesShearer I., International Legal Relations between Australia and Taiwan: Behind the Façade, „Australian Year Book of International Law”, 2000, t. 21.
dcterms.referencesSik K.S., The Dutch-Taiwanese Submarines Deal: legal aspects, „Netherlands Yearbook of International Law” 1982, t. 13.
dcterms.referencesSilvanie H., Responsibility of States for Acts of Unsuccessful Insurgent Governments, Columbia University Press, New York 1939.
dcterms.referencesSimmonds R., Legal Problems Arising from the United Nations Military Operations in the Congo, Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague 1968.
dcterms.referencesSklar R.R., Zambia’s response to the Rhodesian unilateral declaration of independence [w:] W. Tordoff (red.), Politics in Zambia, University of California Press, Berkeley–Los Angeles 1974.
dcterms.referencesŠkrk M., Recognition of States and Its (Non-) Implication on State Succession: The Case of Successor States to the Former Yugoslavia [w:] M. Mrak (red.), Succession of States, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, The Hague 1999.
dcterms.referencesSkubiszewski K., Poland and some other Eastern European countries [w:] E. Lauterpacht, J.G. Collier (red.), Individual Rights and the State in Foreign Affairs. An International Compendium, Praeger Publishers, New York 1977.
dcterms.referencesSkubiszewski K., Uchwały prawotwórcze organizacji międzynarodowych, Poznańskie Towarzystwo Przyjaciół Nauk, Poznań 1965.
dcterms.referencesSkubiszewski K., Warunki uzyskania członkostwa Organizacji Narodów Zjednoczonych, Ars boni et aequi, Poznań 2004.
dcterms.referencesSloane R., The Changing Face of Recognition in International Law: A Case Study of Tibet, „Emory International Law Review” 2002, t. 16.
dcterms.referencesSmirnova N., Macedonia in the context of present-day Russian foreign policy [w:] J. Pettifer (red.), The New Macedonian Question, Palgrave Macmillan, London–New York 1999.
dcterms.referencesSozański J., Znaczenie istotniejszych atrybutów podmiotowych dla ustalenia podmiotowości międzynarodowoprawnej, „Roczniki Nauk Prawnych” 2008, t. 18, nr 1.
dcterms.referencesSpernbauer M., EULEX Kosovo: The Difficult Deployment and Challenging Implementation of the Most Comprehensive Civilian EU Operation to Date, 2010, t. 11, nr 8.
dcterms.referencesSrogosz T., Budowanie państwa – aspekt międzynarodowy, „Przegląd Prawa Publicznego”, 2008, t. 11.
dcterms.referencesStahn C., The Law and Practice of International Territorial Administration: Versailles to Iraq and Beyond, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2008.
dcterms.referencesStakhyra H., Applicability of Private Law of De-facto Regimes, „Osteuropa-Recht” 2019, t. 65, nr 2.
dcterms.referencesStankiewicz W., Problemy samostanowienia i suwerenności Somalilandu, „Stosunki Międzynarodowe”, 2005, t. 32, nr 3–4.
dcterms.referencesSteinberg D.I., Tenuous Beginnings, Vigorous Developments [w:] D.I. Steinberg (red.), Korea’s Changing Roles in Southeast Asia: Expanding Influence and Relations, ISEAS Publishing, Singapore 2010.
dcterms.referencesStephan M.J., J. Mundy, A Battlefield Transformed: From Guerilla Resistance to Mass Nonviolent Struggle in The Western Sahara, „Journal of Military and Strategic Studies” 2006, t. 8, nr 3.
dcterms.referencesStępień M., Problematyka „państw” nielegalnych [w:] B. Mielnik, A. Wnukiewicz- -Kozłowska (red.), Podmiotowość w prawie międzynarodowym, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Wrocławskiego, Wrocław 2013.
dcterms.referencesStivachtis Y.A., The Enlargement of International Society: Culture versus Anarchy and Greece’s Entry into International Society, Palgrave Macmillan, London 1998.
dcterms.referencesStrupp K., Das völkerrechtliche Delikt, Verlag von W. Kohlhammer, Stuttgart 1920.
dcterms.referencesSubcommittee on Africa of the Committee on Foreign Affairs, U.S. House of Representatives, The complex of United States-Portuguese relations: before and after the coup, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington 1974.
dcterms.referencesSummers J., Kosovo: From Yugoslav Province to Disputed Independence [w:] J. Summers (red.), Kosovo: A Precedent? – The Declaration of Independence, the Advisory Opinion and Implications for Statehood, Self-Determination and Minority Rights, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Leiden–Boston 2011.
dcterms.referencesSummers J., Russia and competing spheres of influence: the case of Georgia, Abkhazia and South Ossetia [w:] M. Happold (red.), International Law in a Multipolar World, Routledge, London–New York 2012.
dcterms.referencesSutor J., Prawo dyplomatyczne i konsularne, Wydawnictwo Prawnicze LexisNexis, Warszawa 2008.
dcterms.referencesSymonides J., Kilka uwag w sprawie prawnomiędzynarodowego statusu platform, sztucznych wysp, instalacji i konstrukcji morskich, „Prawo Morskie” 2014, t. 30.
dcterms.referencesSymonides J., Kryteria uznania państwa i rządu w teorii i praktyce międzynarodowej, „Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Mikołaja Kopernika w Toruniu. Nauki Humanistyczno-Społeczne. Nauki Polityczne” 1969, z. 36.
dcterms.referencesSymonides J., Organizacja Narodów Zjednoczonych: Geneza, podstawa, cele i zasady funkcjonowania, struktura, organy główne i pomocnicze, system Narodów Zjednoczonych [w:] J. Symonides (red.), Organizacja Narodów Zjednoczonych. Bilans i perspektywy, Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar, Warszawa 2006.
dcterms.referencesSymonides J., „Społeczność międzynarodowa” jako kategoria nauki o stosunkach międzynarodowych, „Przegląd Stosunków Międzynarodowych” 1979, nr 5 (83).
dcterms.referencesSymonides J., Zasada efektywności w prawie międzynarodowym, Wydawnictwa Uniwersytetu Mikołaja Kopernika, Toruń 1967.
dcterms.referencesSzarek-Zwijacz A., „Państwo Palestyna” – status prawny i aktywność Palestyny we współczesnych stosunkach międzynarodowych [w:] J. Menkes, E. Wacinkiewicz-Cała (red.), Państwo i terytorium w prawie międzynarodowym, Wydawnictwo C.H. Beck, Warszawa 2015.
dcterms.referencesSzpak A., Secesja państwa w świetle prawa międzynarodowego: na przykładzie Kosowa i Krymu, „Państwo i Prawo”, 2014, t. 69, nr 12.
dcterms.referencesTalmon S., Kollektive Nichtanerkennung illegaler Staaten: Grundlagen und Rechtsfolgen einer international koordinierten Sanktion, dargestellt am Beispiel der Türkischen Republik Nord-Zypern, Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen 2006.
dcterms.referencesTalmon S., Recognition of Governments in International Law. With Particular Reference to the Governments in Exile, Oxford University Press, Oxford 1998.
dcterms.referencesTalmon S., Responsibility of Outside Powers for Acts of Secessionist Entities, „International and Comparative Law Quarterly”, 2009, t. 58, nr 3.
dcterms.referencesTalmon S., The Cyprus Question before the European Court of Justice, „The European Journal of International Law”, 2001, t. 12, nr 4.
dcterms.referencesTalmon S., The European Union-Turkey Controversy over Cyprus or a Tale of Two Treaty Declarations, „The Chinese Journal of International Law”, 2006, t. 5, nr 3.
dcterms.referencesTalmon S., La non reconnaissance collective des États illégaux, Éditions A. Pedone, Paris 2007.
dcterms.referencesTammes A.J.P., Netherlands Courts and International Recognition [w:] W.J.M. Van Eysinga (red.), Symbolae Verzijl: présentées au professeur J.H.W. Verzijl à l’occasion de son LXXX-ième anniversaire, Martinus Nijhoff, La Haye 1958.
dcterms.referencesTams C.J., Enforcing Obligations Erga Omnes in International Law, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2005.
dcterms.referencesTamzarian A., Nagorno-Karabagh’s Right to Political Independence under International Law: An Application of the Principle of Self-Determination, „Southwestern University Law Review”, 1994, t. 24.
dcterms.referencesTappe T.N., Chechnya and the State of Self-Determination in a Breakaway Region of the Former Soviet Union: Evaluating the Legitimacy of Secessionist Claims, „Columbia Journal of Transnational Law”, 1995, t. 34, nr 1.
dcterms.referencesTerry P.C.R., The 1948 Recognition of the State of Israel by the USA and the USSR and International Law, „Finnish Yearbook of International Law”, 2012, t. 23.
dcterms.referencesTeuscher H.H., Die vorzeitige Anerkennung im Völkerrecht, Max Kramer Verlag, Münster 1958.
dcterms.referencesTierney S., In a State of Flux: Self-Determination and the Collapse of Yugoslavia, „International Journal on Minority and Group Rights”, 1999, t. 6, nr 1–2.
dcterms.referencesTønnesson S., War and Peace between Nations Since 1945 [w:] N.G. Owen (red.), Routledge Handbook of Southeast Asian History, Routledge, London–New York 2014.
dcterms.referencesTriepel H., Droit International et droit interne, Pedone, Paris 1920.
dcterms.referencesTsai S.H., Lee Teng-hui and Taiwan’s Quest for Identity, Palgrave Macmillan, New York 2005.
dcterms.referencesTürk D., Recognition of States: A Comment, „The European Journal of International Law”, 1993, t. 4, nr 1.
dcterms.referencesTurns D., The Stimson Doctrine of Non-Recognition: Its Historical Genesis and Influence on Contemporary International Law, „The Chinese Journal of International Law”, 2003, t. 2, nr 1.
dcterms.referencesTzevelekos V.P., Reconstructing the Effective Control Criterion in Extraterritorial Human Rights Breaches: Direct Attribution of Wrongfulness, Due Diligence, and Concurrent Responsibility, „Michigan Journal of International Law”, 2014, t. 36, nr 1.
dcterms.referencesvan Essen J., De Facto Regimes in International Law, „Utrecht Journal of International and European Law” 2012, t. 28, nr 74.
dcterms.referencesvan Kleffens E.N., Sovereignty in International Law : Five Lectures, „Recueil des Cours”, 1953, t. 82.
dcterms.referencesvan Willigen N., Peacebuilding and International Administration: The cases of Bosnia and Herzegovina and Kosovo, Routledge, Abingdon 2013.
dcterms.referencesVerdross A., Règles générales du droit international de la paix, „Recueil des Cours”, 1929, t. 30.
dcterms.referencesVerdross A., Völkerrecht, Springer-Verlag, Wien 1964.
dcterms.referencesVerhoeven J., Jurisprudence belge relative au droit international, „Revue Belge de Droit International”, 1983, t. 2.
dcterms.referencesVerhoeven J., La reconnaissance internationale dans la pratique contemporaine: Les relations publiques internationales, Éditions A. Pedone, Paris 1975.
dcterms.referencesVerhoeven J., Relations internationales de droit privé en l’absence de reconnaissance d’un état, d’un gouvernement ou d’une situation „Recueil des Cours”, 1985, t. 192.
dcterms.referencesVerzijl J.H.W., International Law in Historical Perspective, t. II: International Persons, A.W. Sijthoff, Leyden 1969.
dcterms.referencesVidmar J., Democratic Statehood in International Law: The Emergence of New States in Post-Cold War Practice, Hart Publishing, Oxford–Portland 2013.
dcterms.referencesVidmar J., Montenegro’s Path to Independence: A Study of Self-Determination, Statehood and Recognition, „Hanse Law Review” 2007, t. 3, nr 1.
dcterms.referencesvon Below N., At Hitler’s Side: The Memoirs of Hitler’s Luftwaffe Adjutant 1937–1945, Pen & Sword Books, Barnsley 2010.
dcterms.referencesvon Glahn G., Taulbee J.L., Law Among Nations: An Introduction to Public International Law, Pearson Education, Inc., Boston 2013.
dcterms.referencesvon Liszt F., Das Völkerrecht: Systematisch dargestellt, Verlag von Julius Springer, Berlin 1925.
dcterms.referencesWaldenberg M., Rozbicie Jugosławii: jugosłowiańskie lustro międzynarodowej polityki, Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar, Warszawa 2005.
dcterms.referencesWallace-Bruce N.L., Taiwan and Somalia: International Legal Curiosities, „Queen’s Law Journal”, 1996, t. 22.
dcterms.referencesWang V.W.C., All Dressed Up But Not Invited to the Party: Can Taiwan Join the United Nations Now the Cold War Is Over? [w:] J.M. Henckaerts (red.), The International Status of Taiwan in the New World Order: Legal and Political Considerations, Kluwer Law International, The Hague 1996.
dcterms.referencesWarbrick C., Kosovo: The Declatation of Independence, „International and Comparative Law Quarterly”, 2008, t. 57, nr 3.
dcterms.referencesWarbrick C., Recognition of States: Recent European Practice [w:] M.D. Evans (red.), Aspects of Statehood and Institutionalism in Contemporary Europe, Dartmouth Publishing, Dartmouth 1997.
dcterms.referencesWarbrick C., Unrecognized States and Domestic Law, „The Modern Law Review”, 1987, t. 50, nr 1.
dcterms.referencesWeatherall T., The Status of the Prohibition of Terrorism in International Law: Recent Developments, „The Georgetown Journal of International Law”, 2015, t. 46, nr 2.
dcterms.referencesWeil P., France [w:] E. Lauterpacht, J.G. Collier (red.), Individual Rights and the State in Foreign Affairs. An International Compendium, Praeger Publishers, New York 1977.
dcterms.referencesWengler W., Völkerrecht, Springer-Verlag, Berlin–Heidelberg 1964.
dcterms.referencesWestlake J., International Law, t. 1, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1904.
dcterms.referencesWeston Ash R., Is Palestine a ‘State’? A Response to Professor John Quigley’s Article, ‘The Palestine Declaration to the International Criminal Court: The Statehood Issue’ [w:] C. Meloni, G. Tognoni (red.), Is There a Court for Gaza?: A Test Bench for International Justice, T.M.C. Asser Press, The Hague 2012.
dcterms.referencesWheaton H., Elements of International Law, Stevens & Sons, London 1878.
dcterms.referencesWiddig V., Detention by Organised Armed Groups in Non-International Armed Conflicts: the Role of Non-State Actors in a State-Centred International Legal System [w:] B. Baade, L. Mührel, A.O. Petrov (red.), International Humanitarian Law in Areas of Limited Statehood. Adaptable and Legitimate or Rigid and Unreasonable?, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft, Baden-Baden 2018.
dcterms.referencesWidłak T., Klauzula Martensa na tle pojęcia „ludzkość” w prawie międzynarodowym [w:] D.R. Bugajski (red.), Międzynarodowe prawo humanitarne, t. III: Zasady podejmo- wania działań przy użyciu siły, Wydawnictwo Akademickie Akademia Marynarki Wojennej, Gdynia 2012.
dcterms.referencesWiewióra B., Uznanie nabytków terytorialnych w prawie międzynarodowym, Instytut Zachodni, Poznań 1961.
dcterms.referencesWilde R., Recognition in International Law [w:] Recognition of States: the Consequences of Recognition or Non-Recognition in UK and International Law. Meeting Summary, Chatham House, London 2010.
dcterms.referencesWilhelm J., Sezessionsrecht des Volkes im ethnischen Sinne und Anerkennung von Staaten, praca doktorska obroniona na uniwersytecie w Heidelbergu (niepubl.), Heidelberg 2003.
dcterms.referencesWillame J.C., Patrimonialism and Political Change in the Congo, Stanford University Press, Stanford 1972.
dcterms.referencesWilliams J.F., La doctrine de la reconnaissance en droit international et ses développements récents, „Recueil des Cours”, 1933, t. 44.
dcterms.referencesWilson G.G., International Law, Silver, Burdett and Company, New York 1922.
dcterms.referencesWodie F., La sécession du Biafra et le droit international public, „Revue Gé né rale de Droit International Public”, 1969, t. 73.
dcterms.referencesWojtczak P., Status prawny Autonomii Palestyńskiej w świetle zasady efektywności, „Administracja. Teoria. Dydaktyka. Praktyka”, 2009, t. 16, nr 3.
dcterms.referencesWolf C., Indonesian Story: The Birth, Growth and Structure of the Indonesian Republic, American Institute of Pacific Relations, New York 1948.
dcterms.referencesWolfke K., Custom in Present International Law, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Dordrecht 1993.
dcterms.referencesWorld Bank, Bosnia and Herzegovina: Toward Economic Recovery, World Bank, Washington 1996.
dcterms.referencesWorster W.T., Law, Politics, and the Conception of the State in State Recognition Theory, „Boston University International Law Journal 2009”, t. 27, nr 1.
dcterms.referencesWortley B.A., The interaction of public and private international law today, „Recueil des Cours”, 1954, t. 85.
dcterms.referencesWright Q., Recognition, Intervention and Ideologies, „The Indian Yearbook of International Affairs”, 1958, t. 7.
dcterms.referencesWright Q., The Legal Background in the Far East [w:] Q. Wright, H. Lauterpacht, E.M. Borchard, P. Morrison (red.), Legal Problems in the Far Eastern Conflict, Institute of Pacific Relations, New York 1941.
dcterms.referencesWright Q., Some Legal Aspects of the Far Eastern Situation, „The American Journal of International Law” 1933, t. 27, nr 3.
dcterms.referencesWyler E., Théorie et pratique de la reconnaissance d’État Une approche épistémologique du droit international, Éditions Bruylant, Bruxelles 2013.
dcterms.referencesWyrozumska A., Traktaty ustanawiające reżimy terytorialne, „Folia Iuridica” 1987, t. 31.
dcterms.referencesWyrozumska A., Umowy międzynarodowe. Teoria i praktyka, Wydawnictwo Prawo i Praktyka Gospodarcza, Warszawa 2006.
dcterms.referencesYang S., The Republic of China’s Right to Participate in the United Nations [w:] J.M. Henckaerts (red.), The International Status of Taiwan in the New World Order: Legal and Political Considerations, Kluwer Law International, The Hague 1996.
dcterms.referencesYee S., Report on the ILC Project on “Identification of Customary International Law”, „The Chinese Journal of International Law”, 2015, t. 14, nr 2.
dcterms.referencesYoung C., Politics in the Congo: Decolonization and Independence, Princeton University Press, Princeton 1965.
dcterms.referencesZaid M.S., Taiwan: It Looks Like It, It Acts Like It, But Is It a State? The Ability to Achieve a Dream Through Membership in International Organizations, „New England Law Review”, 1998, t. 32
dcterms.referencesZając P., Niepodległość Kosowa z perspektywy społecznej teorii stosunków międzynarodowych, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Marii Curie-Skłodowskiej, Lublin 2015.
dcterms.referencesZaręba S., Les résolutions du Conseil de sécurité des Nations Unies et «les personnes agissant de concert en leur qualité de représentants du peuple»: quelques remarques sur l’avis consultatif de la CIJ sur le Kosovo [w:] L. Balmond, M. Arcari (red.), Diversification des acteurs et dynamique normative en droit international contemporain, Editoriale Scientifica, Milano 2013.
dcterms.referencesZaręba S., Podstawy prawne zbiorowej odmowy uznania państw na forum organizacji uniwersalnych – studium przypadków, „Studia Prawnicze”, 2014, t. 195, nr 3.
dcterms.referencesZaręba S., Specyfika odpowiedzialności za naruszenia europejskiej konwencji praw człowieka związane z działalnością nieuznawanych reżimów – analiza orzecznictwa, „Studia Prawnicze”, 2016, t. 207, nr 3.
dcterms.referencesZieliński J., Metodologia pracy naukowej, Oficyna Wydawnicza ASPRA-JR, Warszawa 2012.
dcterms.referencesZivier E.R., Die Nichtanerkennung im modernen Völkerrecht. Probleme staatlicher Willensäußerung, Berlin Verlag, Berlin 1969.
dcterms.referencesZunes S., Western Sahara, Resources, and International Accountability [w:] D. Kingsbury (red.), Western Sahara: International Law, Justice and Natural Resources, Routledge, Abingdon–New York 2018.
dcterms.referencesŽourek J., Le statut et les fonctions des consuls, „Recueil des Cours”, 1962, t. 106.
Files
Collections
Seria: Rozprawy Prawnicze