Miąsik, DawidSzwarc, MonikaSołtys, AgnieszkaPoździk, RafałKornobis-Romanowska, DagmaraPrus, ŁukaszDomańska, MonikaKapica, KamilKawka, IngaKowalik-Bańczyk, KrystynaSzpyrka, MichalinaSzmigielski, ArturKuźnicka-Błaszkowska, DominikaMaterna, GrzegorzMiąsik, Dawid2026-07-072026-07-072026D. Miąsik (ed.), Enforcing EU Law at the National Level : EU General Principles and the Imposition of Fines , Routledge, Abingdon, Oxon - New York 2026.978100365289297810411000279781003652892https://e-bp.inp.pan.pl/handle/123456789/985This book examines the interface between EU primary law and national substantive and procedural legislation governing fines imposed by Member States for breaches of European law or national implementing legislation. It focuses on analyzing the general principles of EU law and the European fundamental rights enshrined in the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union. It explains the links between EU law and national fining legislation or proceedings that trigger the duty to respect EU primary law. It covers the concepts of consistent interpretation, the primacy of EU law, and the effectiveness of European fundamental rights and general principles from the perspective of national fining proceedings and the protection of individuals. The collection discusses the following principles and fundamental rights: the principle of legal certainty, the principle of protection of legitimate expectations, the principles of equal treatment and non-discrimination, the principle of proportionality, the principle of ne bis in idem, the principle of good administration, and the right to an effective remedy. Each principle or fundamental right has been analyzed coherently, with the focus on the rights of individuals and the duties of national administrative authorities and courts in the course of national fining proceedings. It also explores the interdependencies between various principles and rights, as well as some specific problems in this area that have occurred in Poland, thus showing the practical importance of the research, or issues that are common to all Member States irrespective of differences in national procedures and fining provisions. The volume will be a valuable resource for researchers, academics, and policy-makers working in the areas of EU law, Administrative Law, and Comparative Law.<<p. 1-4>> Miąsik, Dawid Introduction <<p. 7-25>> Szwarc, Monika Duty to respect the EU general principles of law and fundamental rights in national fining proceedings <<p. 26-53>> Sołtys, Agnieszka The principle of consistent interpretation : Its application and limitations in national fining proceedings <<p. 54-86>> Miąsik, Dawid Poździk, Rafał The consequences of the failure to observe European general principles and fundamental rights in national fining proceedings <<p. 89-112>> Kornobis-Romanowska, Dagmara Principle of legal certainty : Does it really limit the effectiveness of EU law in national fining proceedings? <<p. 113-128>> Prus, Łukasz The principle of the protection of legitimate expectations : Still more promising than delivering? <<p. 129-151>> Domańska, Monika The principles of equality and non-discrimination in fining proceedings <<p. 152-185>> Miąsik, Dawid The principle of proportionality and assessment of national fines <<p. 186-217>> Kapica, Kamil The principle of ne bis in idem : A protection against disproportionate penalty : A new version of an old principle <<p. 218-243>> Kawka, Inga Principle of good administration : How the general principles of EU law supplement the Charter of Fundamental Rights in national fining proceedings <<p. 244-283>> Kowalik-Bańczyk, Krystyna Principle of rights of defence : Between procedural autonomy and effectiveness of EU fundamental rights in national fining proceedings <<p. 284-306>> Szpyrka, Michalina Right to an effective remedy : A judicial right binding administrative authorities <<p. 309-322>> Szmigielski, Artur Principle of legal certainty in addressing novel anticompetitive abuses of a dominant position in the digital economy : What should the role of antitrust authorities be in imposing fines? <<p. 323-343>> Kuźnicka-Błaszkowska, Dominika Mitigation of fines by national data protection authorities : A case study of Bisnode – III OSK 2538/21 . <<p. 344-376>> Materna, Grzegorz The ne bis in idem principle and the legal liability of natural persons for bid rigging : The case of Polish competition and criminal law <<p. 377-382>> Miąsik, Dawid Conclusions : Towards a common standard in national fining proceedings?enUnia EuropejskaEuropean UnionKarta Praw Podstawowych Unii EuropejskiejCharter of Fundamental Rights of the European Unionprawo wspólnotowe Unii Europejskiejcommunity law of the European Unionpaństwa członkowskie UEEU member statesegzekwowanie prawaenforcement of lawzasady prawa UEprinciples of EU lawkara pieniężnagrzywnafinemiarkowanie kary pienieżnejmoderation of a fineszobowiązanie międzynarodoweinternational obligationsnaruszenie prawabreach of the lawprzepisy wykonawczelaw enforcement provisionszasada pierwszeństwaprinciple of primacyzasada spójnej interpretacjiprinciple of consistent interpretationpostępowanie karnecriminal proceedingsprawa podstawowefundamental rightspewność prawnalegal certaintyzasada uzasadnionych oczekiwańprinciple of legitimate expectationszasada niedyskryminacjiprinciple of non-discriminationrówność wobec prawaequality before the lawzasada proporcjonalnościprinciple of proportionalityzasada ne bis in idemne bis in idem principleprawo do dobrej administracjiright to good administrationprawo do skutecznego środka odwoławczegoright to an effective remedyorgan administracyjnystate admininistrative bodypostępowanie administracyjneadministrative proceedingsprzegląd orzecznictwareview of judicial decisionsTrybunał Sprawiedliwości UECourt of Justice of the EUBook10.4324/9781003652892